Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42900289›Full record

SynthesisPediatric surgery international2026

Neonatal gastric perforation: a systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical characteristics, risk factors, surgical management and outcomes.

Fayaz Ahmad Najar, Mohamad Altaf Ganayee, Ubayer Nabi

Abstract readSystematic ReviewMeta-Analysis
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Pediatric surgery international, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Fayaz Ahmad NajarGovernment Medical College, Srinagar, India. fayazgmc91@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7143-9227
Mohamad Altaf GanayeeSher-i-Kashmir Institute of Medical Sciences, Soura, Srinaga, India.
Ubayer NabiGovernment Medical College, Srinagar, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundNeonatal gastric perforation (NGP) is a rare but life-threatening surgical emergency of the newborn. We systematically reviewed its clinical characteristics, risk factors, surgical management and outcomes.

methodsFive databases were searched from inception to 31 December 2025 for observational studies reporting at least five neonates (≤ 28 days) with confirmed gastric perforation. Two reviewers independently screened records, extracted data and appraised quality. Proportions were pooled using random-effects models; predictors of mortality were summarised as odds ratios (OR). The review followed PRISMA 2020 and was registered in the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO).

resultsTwenty studies (410 neonates) were included. Pooled prevalences were prematurity 58.3%, low birth weight 63.5% and male sex 59.0%; abdominal distension (90.5%) and pneumoperitoneum (80.9%) were the commonest features. Primary repair was performed in 78.4% of operated neonates. Pooled in-hospital mortality was 28.6% (95% CI 22.0-36.3%). Sepsis at presentation (OR 4.10) and delay to surgery beyond 24 h (OR 3.55) were the strongest predictors of death.

conclusionsNGP mainly affects premature, low-birth-weight neonates, and still carries approximately 28% mortality. Early recognition, prompt treatment of sepsis and timely surgery offer the clearest route to improved survival. PROSPERO ID: CRD420261436438.

Indexed as

Stomach RuptureHumansInfant, NewbornRisk FactorsTreatment OutcomeGastric perforationMeta-analysisMortalityNeonateNewbornPaediatric surgeryPneumoperitoneumPrematurity

Identifiers

PMID42900289

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.