Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42900280›Full record

ArticleHealth & justice2026

Statewide implementation of MOUD in jails: aligning barriers and strategies in the quest for acceptability and feasibility.

Bryce Kushmerick-McCune, Danielle S Rudes, Thomas R Blue, Frank J Vocci, Michael S Gordon

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health & justice, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Bryce Kushmerick-McCuneDepartment of Criminal Justice and Criminology, Sam Houston State University, Huntsville, United States. bck024@shsu.edu.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0004-2444-3065
Danielle S RudesDepartment of Criminal Justice and Criminology, Sam Houston State University, Huntsville, United States.
Thomas R BlueFriends Research Institute, Baltimore, United States.
Frank J VocciFriends Research Institute, Baltimore, United States.
Michael S GordonFriends Research Institute, Baltimore, United States.

Funding

Long-acting naltrexone for pre-release prisoners: A randomized trial of mobile treatmentUG1DA050077 · NIDA · FRIENDS RESEARCH INSTITUTE, INC. · PI BLUE, THOMAS, GORDON, MICHAEL SCOTT · 2019 to 2023
$11.6M
NIDA NIH HHS UG1 DA050077NIDA NIH HHS UG1DA050077
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In 2019, the Maryland legislature passed a bill mandating that county jails provide medications for opioid use disorder (MOUD) to incarcerated persons. While vast scholarship points out common barriers to MOUD implementation in carceral settings, and some also depict facilitators of implementation, largely missing from these evaluative studies is a clear understanding of the process of identifying barriers and identifying ways to overcome these barriers (i.e., strategies). To address this scholarly gap, we conducted in-depth interviews with jail and community health leaders in Maryland counties in 2022 and follow-up interviews one year later, after the January 2023 compliance deadline. These leaders were participating in a Learning Collaborative as part of a larger comparative effectiveness trial comparing extended-release buprenorphine versus extended-release naltrexone. In interviews, participants focused their discussion on nine main implementation barriers and associated strategies, including: 1) staffing shortages, 2) financial barriers, 3) staff buy-in, 4) concerns of medication diversion, 5) space, 6) client buy-in, 7) intra- and extra- organizational relationships, 8) peer support, and 9) leadership. Our analysis suggests that while some barriers to MOUD implementation were mitigated through targeted strategies, others remained persistent or worsened. Notably, it appears that some important and salient challenges were ignored (or at least, not acted on) and sometimes leaders came up with strategies that were targeting non-existent (or not important and salient) challenges. Specifically, we find that while barriers including staff buy-in, client buy-in, space concerns, and fears of medication diversion lessened as strategies including staff education, client education, space accommodations, and diversion protocols increased, others, including staffing shortages, financial constraints, strained intra- and extra-organizational relationships, and leadership challenges, were particularly persistent and even intensified over time. Further, comparing barrier and strategy frequencies revealed critical mismatches, where the most frequently cited barriers (e.g., staffing and medication diversion) were met with disproportionately fewer strategies while lesser cited barriers (e.g., client buy-in) were frequently innovated on. This work identifies insights that may inform carceral-based MOUD efforts more broadly, especially as more states consider legislation mandating carceral-based MOUD.

Indexed as

Carceral reformImplementation scienceJailMOUDOUD

Identifiers

PMID42900280
PMCPMC13682136

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.