ArticleJournal of molecular modeling2026
Integrated computational and biochemical identification of quinoline-8-arylsulfonamides as disruptors of the Skp2-Cks1 protein-protein interaction.
Article in Journal of molecular modeling, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
contextThe Skp2-Cks1 protein-protein interaction is essential for the recognition and ubiquitination of cell-cycle regulators such as p27 and represents an attractive target for anticancer drug discovery. This study aimed to identify small-molecule disruptors of the Skp2-Cks1 interface from a quinoline-8-arylsulfonamide library using an integrated computational and experimental approach. Comparative MM/PBSA analysis indicated that C2 and C1 produced the greatest predicted weakening of the interface, with ΔΔGₚₚᵢ values of +13.19 and +9.54 kcal/mol, respectively. Conversely, C3 and C4 yielded negative values of -15.21 and -26.47 kcal/mol, consistent with predicted interface stabilization. These computational findings were supported by the biochemical activity ranking: C2 and C1 exhibited the lowest IC₅₀ values, at 1.48 ± 0.13 and 1.87 ± 0.13 µM, respectively, compared with 2.62 ± 0.35 µM for the reference compound NSC689857. C3 and C4 showed substantially weaker activity. These findings identify quinoline-8-arylsulfonamides as a promising chemotype for targeting the Skp2-Cks1 interface and prioritize C2 for further optimization.
methodsA funnel-based virtual screening strategy was applied to 74 compounds, incorporating diversity and drug-likeness filtering, molecular docking with AutoDock Vina, short molecular dynamics refinement, and MM/PBSA rescoring. Prioritized complexes underwent 1000 ns molecular dynamics simulations, free-energy landscape analysis, quantitative assessment of protein-protein interaction disruption metrics, and in silico ADMET profiling. Comparative MM/PBSA calculations evaluated ligand-induced changes in Skp2-Cks1 interaction energy relative to the apo complex. Biochemical inhibitory activity was assessed using an in vitro homogeneous time-resolved fluorescence (HTRF) assay.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42900235What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.