ArticleTranslational behavioral medicine2026
Identifying capacity building priorities for implementation science in suicide prevention: a concept mapping study in Australia.
Article in Translational behavioral medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundCapacity building in the science and practice of implementation is critical for driving and evaluating meaningful change. However, capacity needs of stakeholders to effectively apply implementation science in suicide prevention remain unclear. PURPOSE: To address this gap in Australia, we conducted a concept mapping (CM) study to identify and prioritize stakeholder capacity-building needs in this area.
methodsDiverse stakeholders: practitioners, lived experience advocates, researchers, public servants, and clinicians working within the suicide prevention sector in Australia participated in the study. Using CM, participants individually brainstormed statements representing capacity-building needs for implementation science for suicide prevention. These statements were then organized in clusters and rated on importance and feasibility. Data were collected, analyzed, and visually represented using the groupwisdom™ platform.
resultsIn total, 52 stakeholders participated in at least one stage of the study (i.e. brainstorming, sorting and/or rating). Brainstorming generated 59 statements, which were synthesized into 53 distinctive statements and supplemented with 13 statements from the literature. A multidimensional scaling and hierarchical cluster analysis generated many cluster solutions, out of which an eight-cluster solution was chosen as the most meaningful. Knowledge dissemination and lived experience integration clusters were rated highest on importance and feasibility.
conclusionsThis study provides a snapshot of implementation capacity-building needs and priorities within the suicide prevention sector in Australia. The identified priorities can help inform future sector capacity-building initiatives for implementation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.