ArticleCNS neuroscience & therapeutics2026
The Real-World Safety Profile of Haloperidol: A Comprehensive Pharmacovigilance Analysis Using the Large-Scale FAERS Database.
Article in CNS neuroscience & therapeutics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveHaloperidol is a widely prescribed antipsychotic, but its long-term safety profile across broad populations remains insufficiently researched. Using the large-scale FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) database, this study sought to comprehensively characterize the real-world adverse event profile of haloperidol and identify potential safety signals.
methodsAdverse event reports from FAERS spanning Q1 2004 through Q1 2026, with haloperidol listed as the primary suspect drug, were analyzed. Disproportionality analyses employing four complementary algorithms (ROR, PRR, BCPNN, and MGPS) were conducted. Time-to-onset and Weibull distribution analyses were also performed.
resultsA total of 9916 reports associated with haloperidol were analyzed, covering 27 System Organ Classes (SOC). The primary SOCs were nervous system disorders, psychiatric disorders, and cardiac disorders. At the preferred terms (PT) level, extrapyramidal disorder, weight increased, neuroleptic malignant syndrome, tremor, and dystonia were the most frequently reported adverse events. Cardiovascular-related adverse events (e.g., electrocardiogram QT prolonged, tachycardia, cardiac arrest, and torsade de pointes) were confirmed. Significantly, we identified signals for some under-recognized adverse events, including suicide-related behaviors (intentional self-injury, suicide attempt, suicidal ideation) and embolism venous. Most adverse events occurred within the first 30 days of treatment (72.03%), and the Weibull distribution indicated an early failure pattern, suggesting that the risk of adverse events gradually decreased over time.
conclusionsThis pharmacovigilance research confirmed haloperidol's established safety profile and highlighted under-characterized safety signals, offering valuable insight to inform clinical surveillance, risk mitigation, and future study endeavors to optimize the safe application of haloperidol across diverse patient demographics.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.