Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42899668›Full record

ArticleEnvironmental science & technology2026

Aerosol Deposition in the Human Respiratory System from Distinct Urban Sources Using Multiple Exposure Metrics.

Imre Salma, Máté Vörösmarty, Árpád Farkas

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Environmental science & technology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Imre SalmaInstitute of Chemistry, Eötvös Loránd University, Pázmány stny. 1, H-1117Budapest, Hungary.ORCID 0000-0001-8319-1647
Máté VörösmartyInstitute of Chemistry, Eötvös Loránd University, Pázmány stny. 1, H-1117Budapest, Hungary.
Árpád FarkasHUN-REN Centre for Energy Research , Konkoly-Thege Miklós út 29-33, H-1121Budapest, Hungary.

Funding

Nemzeti Kutat?si Fejleszt?si ls Innov?ci?s Hivatal Advanced 150835
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Targeting specific aerosol sources offers more effective air-quality control than focusing solely on ambient concentrations. Using source apportionment, major contributors to particle number concentrations in the diameter range of 6-1000 nm in urban background of Budapest, Hungary were identified, and their size distributions applied in lung deposition modelling under reference breathing conditions. In this study, we find that most particles penetrate to the deep lung with a maximum deposition at airway generations 17 to 21 depending on physical activity. Deposition fractions vary substantially by source, ranging from 76% (new particle formation) to 27% (solid fuel combustion). Exercise enhances overall deposition, and redistributes the deposited particles within the respiratory tract by decreasing extra-thoracic deposition and increasing the alveolar fraction. Our results also show that deposition rates are more sensitive to physical activity than deposition fractions. These deposition curves exhibit a levelling-off tendency in the extra-thoracic region, while continuing to increase in the lung. Particle number and particle surface area deposition curves are similar in shape, although the relative importance of aerosol sources and the most affected respiratory regions differ. We point that surface-density deposition rates are three orders of magnitude higher in the nose and mouth than in the lung.

Indexed as

Respiratory SystemAerosolsAir PollutantsHumansParticle SizeAerosolsAir Pollutantsbiopersistent particleslung-deposited surface areanew particle formationroad vehicle traffic emissionssecondary inorganic aerosolsolid fuel combustionsootultrafine aerosol particles

Identifiers

PMID42899668
PMCPMC13689813

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.