Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42899665›Full record

ReviewEnvironmental science & technology2026

Current Strengths and Limitations of Toxicokinetic-Toxicodynamic (TKTD) Models for Freshwater Microalgae.

Emma Yenney, Nina Cedergreen

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Environmental science & technology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Emma YenneyDepartment of Plant and Environmental Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Thorvaldsensvej 40, 1871Frederiksberg C, Denmark.ORCID 0009-0007-1616-966X
Nina CedergreenDepartment of Plant and Environmental Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Thorvaldsensvej 40, 1871Frederiksberg C, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0003-4724-9447

Funding

European Commission 101072531
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Toxicokinetic-toxicodynamic (TKTD) models are increasingly used to enhance environmental risk assessment by linking laboratory toxicity data with dynamic exposure scenarios. For freshwater microalgae, which are crucial primary producers, TKTD approaches offer a framework to predict population growth inhibition and recovery under fluctuating chemical stress. A review of 12 studies (2012-2023) applying TKTD models to freshwater planktonic microalgae was conducted to compare their structural assumptions, end points, and validation methods. These models mainly focus on green algae and herbicides that inhibit photosystem II, with limited exploration of other taxonomic groups or modes of action. The complexity of models varies significantly, from simple structures assuming rapid equilibrium between external and internal chemical concentrations to mechanistic models that explicitly incorporate TK components and damage progression. While simple models support regulatory use, omitting TK processes can reduce their effectiveness for chemicals with delayed effects or complex uptake behaviors. Expanding taxonomic coverage and enhancing external validation under realistic exposure conditions is crucial to increasing the ecological relevance of algal TKTD modeling.

Indexed as

MicroalgaeWater Pollutants, ChemicalFresh WaterToxicokineticsWater Pollutants, Chemicalenvironmental risk assessmentfreshwater microalgaepopulation modelingtime variable exposureToxicokinetic toxicodynamic modeling

Identifiers

PMID42899665
PMCPMC13689827

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.