Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42899470›Full record

ArticleChemSusChem2026

The Road to a Linked Data Paradise-Identifying the Barriers From the Experimentalist's Perspective.

Inger-Emma Nylund, Samson Yuxiu Lai

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in ChemSusChem, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Inger-Emma NylundBattery Technology Department, Institute for Energy Technology, Kjeller, Norway.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1431-9384
Samson Yuxiu LaiBattery Technology Department, Institute for Energy Technology, Kjeller, Norway.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8227-3250

Funding

European Commission 101104022European Commission 101104028
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The development of the battery interface ontology (BattINFO) for linked battery data promises a paradise of powerful artificial intelligence agents, based on accurate models which avoid hallucinations, enabled by the reuse of a vast amount of interoperable scholarly data. However, there is still a significant gap between the experimental researchers generating that data in the lab and the computational researchers who need ontologically annotated and curated data. In this perspective article, we investigate the current data handling habits of experimentalists and try to build an understanding of the ontological framework from an experimentalist's perspective. We discovered that current practices rely heavily on scattered data and metadata, often saved in various nonstandard Excel spreadsheets. We believe that the key barriers to the broader adoption of linked data practices are the lack of tools which provide an immediate, apparent, and substantial benefit over the use of Excel. We plan to implement a tool consisting of a relational database and an automatic ontology converter and hope that this will serve as a blueprint for encouraging experimentalists to adopt modified workflows which ontologize all battery data created in the future.

Indexed as

battery data handlingcomputational chemistryelectrochemistryontology

Identifiers

PMID42899470
PMCPMC13681735

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.