ArticleSociology of health & illness2026
Urban Infrastructures of Care: Buses as Resources for Recovery and Mental Wellbeing.
Article in Sociology of health & illness, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Although transport infrastructures are increasingly recognised as determinants of urban wellbeing, their role in trajectories of becoming well and becoming ill has received little empirical and theoretical attention, particularly in serious mental ill-health. This paper examines how bus infrastructures function as everyday resources and obstacles for people living with psychosis. Drawing on qualitative research with young people recovering from early psychosis in Lausanne, Switzerland, we examine the socio-material and affective dimensions of bus mobility through relational geographical perspectives on health and place, mobility studies and work on infrastructures of care. We show how buses can function as affective lifelines, anchors of autonomy and independence and gateways to formal and informal resources for wellbeing, supporting recovery and re-engagement with the city. Buses can also entail sensory overstimulation, proximity to others, perceived surveillance, anxiety and financial constraints. Our analysis highlights how mobility capacities are relationally constituted through encounters with urban infrastructures: buses can cultivate or undermine capacities to engage with the city. We argue that buses should therefore be understood not simply as transport services or conduits to therapeutic resources, but as ordinary infrastructures of care and enabling places through which recovery is enacted in urban life.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.