Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42899294›Full record

ArticleBJR open2026

Predictive value of digital breast tomosynthesis based intratumoral-peritumoral radiomics and clinical features for benign-malignant breast microcalcifications.

Junting Wei, Jie Li, Ruixin Pan, Yun Zhu, Zhizhen Gao

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BJR open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Junting WeiSchool of Medical Imaging, Bengbu Medical University, Bengbu 233030, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0001-1994-8286
Jie LiSchool of Medical Imaging, Bengbu Medical University, Bengbu 233030, China.
Ruixin PanSchool of Medical Imaging, Bengbu Medical University, Bengbu 233030, China.
Yun ZhuDepartment of Radiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Bengbu Medical University, Bengbu 233099, China.
Zhizhen GaoSchool of Medical Imaging, Bengbu Medical University, Bengbu 233030, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0000-8918-9185

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: To investigate the value of clinical and radiomics features in distinguishing benign from malignant breast microcalcifications and develop a noninvasive model to reduce unnecessary biopsies. Methods: This retrospective study analyzed 181 microcalcification lesions from 172 patients. Lesions were divided into training/validation sets (7:3). Manual volumes of interest were delineated on digital breast tomosynthesis images. Radiomics features were extracted from intratumoral and peritumoral regions. Among 9 machine learning classifiers, the optimal performer was selected to develop 3 radiomics models: intratumoral model (RM0), intratumoral and peritumoral 1 mm model (RM1), intratumoral and peritumoral 3 mm model (RM3). Independent clinical risk factors identified by univariate and multivariate logistic regression were integrated with the optimal radiomics model to build a nomogram model (NM). Model performance was evaluated using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves, calibration curves, decision curve analysis, and clinical impact curves. Results: RM0 performed best. Independent risk factors included: Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) category ( Conclusions: Single clinical features showed potential predictive value for microcalcifications, while the integrated model might not demonstrate adequate discriminative power. Advances in knowledge: This study highlights the need for noninvasive differentiation of microcalcifications and suggests that while individual clinical factors have value, combined modeling requires further optimization.

Indexed as

digital breast tomosynthesismicrocalcificationsnomogramperitumoralradiomics

Identifiers

PMID42899294
PMCPMC13679928

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.