Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42899292›Full record

ArticleCrohn's & colitis 3602026

Dietary intake in patients with ileal pouch-anal anastomosis: a cross-sectional comparative study.

Emre Kiliç, Ole Thorlacius-Ussing, Sabrina Just Kousgaard

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Crohn's & colitis 360, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Emre KiliçDepartment of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg, Denmark.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0007-3061-0642
Ole Thorlacius-UssingDepartment of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg, Denmark.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4963-1551
Sabrina Just KousgaardDepartment of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg, Denmark.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2394-7104

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA) is associated with good long-term outcomes, yet pouchitis remains a common complication. Although antibiotics are first-line therapy, recurrent disease often leads to repeated use with declining efficacy. Dietary interventions have shown promise, but evidence and consensus remain limited. The aim of this study was to compare dietary intake between IPAA patients with chronic pouchitis, IPAA patients with a normally functioning pouch, and healthy controls. Methods: This cross-sectional study recruited participants between November 2017 and October 2022. Participants were divided into 3 groups: patients with chronic pouchitis, patients with a normally functioning pouch, and healthy controls with an intact colon. Dietary intake over the previous 12 months was assessed using a food frequency questionnaire. Foods were categorized into groups and reported as servings per week. Results: The study included 30 participants with chronic pouchitis, 30 with a normally functioning pouch, and 82 healthy controls. Compared with the normal pouch function group, participants in the chronic pouchitis group consumed significantly more refined grains (mean difference [MD] 3.0; Conclusion: Dietary intake was generally similar between groups, but patients with chronic pouchitis reported higher consumption of starchy and sugar-rich foods. This dietary pattern may be associated with pouchitis, highlighting the need for interventional studies to assess causality.

Indexed as

chronic pouchitisdietileal pouch-anal anastomosisinflammatory bowel diseaseulcerative colitis

Identifiers

PMID42899292
PMCPMC13680099

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.