ArticlePatient preference and adherence2026
Retrospective Patient Perspectives on Symptom Burden, Emotional Experiences, and Unmet Needs in Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma: A Qualitative Study.
Article in Patient preference and adherence, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To explore how adults with nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) retrospectively described physical symptoms, emotional experiences, and unmet supportive care needs across diagnosis, active treatment, and home recovery in a Chinese tertiary-care setting. Methods: This retrospective, cross-sectional qualitative descriptive study followed the Consolidated Criteria for Reporting Qualitative Research. A purposive sample of 13 patients with pathologically confirmed NPC (7 men and 6 women; aged 28-64 years) was recruited from a tertiary hospital in central China between April and May 2026. Each participant completed one semi-structured, face-to-face interview lasting 30-45 minutes and recalled experiences across diagnosis, active treatment, and home recovery. Recruitment continued until three consecutive interviews yielded no new codes, subthemes, or contextual information. Data were analyzed using Colaizzi's seven-step procedure with NVivo 15.0. The themes were organized in a Patient Journey Map informed by Corbin and Strauss's Chronic Illness Trajectory Framework. Results: Three themes and nine subthemes described distinct phase-specific experiences. At diagnosis, participants reported misattribution of early symptoms, diagnostic shock, role disruption, and unmet information needs. During active treatment, co-occurring oral mucositis, xerostomia, dysphagia, fatigue, body-image concerns, and reduced access to support at night contributed to substantial distress. During home recovery, persistent symptoms, uncertainty about rehabilitation, difficulty resuming daily roles, and fear of cancer recurrence remained prominent, although some participants also described renewed engagement in valued activities. Conclusion: Participants' retrospective accounts identified phase-specific supportive-care gaps at diagnosis, during active treatment, and after discharge. The findings support structured diagnostic communication, coordinated management of co-occurring symptoms with accessible out-of-hours support, and transitional follow-up that includes rehabilitation guidance and psychological screening. Because the study used one retrospective interview per participant at a single center, the findings should be interpreted as a qualitative synthesis rather than evidence of a longitudinal or quantitative pattern.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.