Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42899183›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in plant science2026

Wheat forage quality: significance, genetic and genomic advances, knowledge gaps, and future directions.

Maria Ali, Ehsan Shakiba, Ali M Missaoui, Mohamed Mergoum

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in plant science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Maria AliDepartment of Crop and Soil Sciences, University of Georgia, Griffin, GA, United States.
Ehsan ShakibaIndependent Researcher, Batesville, AR, United States.
Ali M MissaouiDepartment of Crop and Soil Sciences, University of Georgia, Griffin, GA, United States.
Mohamed MergoumDepartment of Crop and Soil Sciences, University of Georgia, Griffin, GA, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Winter wheat is grown worldwide primarily for grain, yet it also serves as an important cool-season forage, supporting livestock production when other feed is scarce. Wheat can be utilized as grazed pasture or harvested as hay, silage, and straw, and is widely used as dual-purpose (forage + grain) and double-cropping systems. During vegetative growth, wheat forage is highly palatable and nutritive, typically containing 20-30% crude protein (CP), and >80% digestibility, supporting rapid liveweight gains in beef cattle. However, forage quality is highly dynamic: as wheat matures, CP and energy decline, while neutral detergent fiber (NDF), acid detergent fiber (ADF), and lignin increase, reducing intake potential and digestibility. Forage quality is also affected by moisture, fertilization, and wheat class. At comparable developmental stages, winter and spring wheat generally show little inherent differences in forage quality, indicating that maturity and management are the major determinants of quality. This review synthesizes current knowledge on wheat forage in dual-purpose and grazing systems, emphasizing dry matter, CP, NDF, ADF, acid detergent lignin, relative feed value, and relative forage quality as key indicators of biomass, nutritive value, intake potential, and digestibility. We further assess developmental shifts in these traits and their consequences on livestock intake, animal performance, and grazing management, together with forage evaluation methods such as near-infrared reflectance spectroscopy. We also examine genetic and genomic approaches for improving forage traits. Wheat breeding has historically prioritized grain yield and straw characteristics, genomic dissection of forage quality remains limited. Nevertheless, recent genome-wide association, QTL mapping, and genomic selection studies targeting water-soluble carbohydrates, fiber fractions, and digestibility-related traits highlight promising avenues for improvement. Overall, wheat forage can provide exceptionally valuable winter feed resources, but its quality is governed by strong developmental, environmental, and genetic effects. Improved screening methods and breeding targets, such as combining high protein and energy with agronomic resilience, are needed to exploit wheat's dual-purpose potential. This review integrates agronomic, animal nutrition, and genetic perspectives to guide future research and breeding of high-quality forage wheat.

Indexed as

cool-season foragedual-purpose wheatforage nutritive valuegenome-wide association studygenomic selectiongrazing managementnear-infrared reflectance spectroscopy

Identifiers

PMID42899183
PMCPMC13679537

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.