ArticleBrain & spine2026
Experiences of being diagnosed with unruptured intracranial aneurysm in a population-based health survey: A qualitative interview study.
Article in Brain & spine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Most unruptured intracranial aneurysms (UIA) are small and carry a low rupture risk. Many patients are therefore not treated with occlusion but managed conservatively. Evidence on the psychological impact of living with an untreated UIA is limited and conflicting. Research question: To explore experiences of receiving a diagnosis of a UIA and having to live with it over time. Material and methods: The Tromsø7 health survey examined 1862 participants with magnetic resonance angiography and 85 diagnosed with conservatively managed UIAs were eligible for inclusion. We invited 24 based on purposive maximum-variation sampling according to age, sex, and aneurysm size, and 18 consented. Twelve participated in semi-structured interviews before data saturation was achieved. We excluded two because the interviews revealed exclusion criteria (cognitive impairment and treated aneurysm). Data from 10 interviews conducted median eight years after diagnosis were included in a thematic analysis. Results: In retrospective narratives, many participants recalled experiencing serious worry or fear shortly after the diagnosis. Most described a subsequent process of adaption to the uncertainty through trust in clinicians, resilience, normalization and meaning-making, which enabled them to reestablish normality in everyday life. Concerns could resurface around follow-ups. Few described persistent anxiety at the time of the interview. The diagnosis motivated healthy lifestyle changes for many. Discussion and conclusion: The interviews revealed substantial psychosocial impacts of having to live with untreated UIAs. We suggest these insights could inform decision-making in contexts where clinicians and patients must balance the potential benefits and burdens of imaging and surveillance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.