Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42899137›Full record

ArticleJournal of hand surgery global online2027

Selective First Carpometacarpal Denervation Is Cost-Effective Compared With Trapeziectomy for Thumb Carpometacarpal Arthritis.

Christopher M Dussik, Carlos Ortiz-Babilonia, Amy Phan, Daniel Yang, Joseph Ferraro

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of hand surgery global online, 2027. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Christopher M DussikDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Rochester School of Medicine, Rochester, NY.
Carlos Ortiz-BabiloniaDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Rochester School of Medicine, Rochester, NY.
Amy PhanDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Rochester School of Medicine, Rochester, NY.
Daniel YangDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Rochester School of Medicine, Rochester, NY.
Joseph FerraroDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Rochester School of Medicine, Rochester, NY.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: Selective first carpometacarpal (CMC) denervation has gained interest as an alternative to trapeziectomy-based procedures for thumb CMC arthritis, with potential advantages including less soft tissue disruption, faster recovery, and preservation of future trapeziectomy as an option. However, cost-effectiveness data remain limited. We aimed to evaluate the 5-year cost-utility of selective first CMC denervation compared with trapeziectomy and continued nonsurgical management. Methods: A hybrid decision-analysis and Markov model was developed for a hypothetical patient with first CMC arthritis who remained symptomatic after 6 months of nonsurgical management. Three strategies were compared over a 5-year horizon: continued nonsurgical management, selective first CMC denervation, and trapeziectomy. Model inputs were derived from a literature review. Costs were modeled from a Medicare Hospital Outpatient Department perspective and discounted at 3% annually. Monte Carlo microsimulation of 1,000 hypothetical patients estimated costs, quality-adjusted life years (QALYs), incremental net monetary benefit, and cost-utility at a willingness-to-pay threshold of $50,000/QALY. Deterministic sensitivity analyses assessed model robustness. Results: Denervation had lower mean 5-year cost than trapeziectomy ($2,706.39 vs $4,276.96) and slightly greater effectiveness (3.87 vs 3.82 QALYs). Compared with trapeziectomy, denervation saved $1,580.46 and gained 0.06 QALYs (95% CI, 0.05-0.06), with a mean incremental net monetary benefit of $4,384.25. Denervation was preferred in 97.4% of simulations and remained cost-effective across all deterministic sensitivity analyses. Conclusions: Selective first CMC denervation was less costly and more effective than trapeziectomy, supporting its cost-effectiveness for persistent first CMC arthritis after failed nonsurgical treatment. Level of evidence: Level II economic. Clinical relevance: Selective first CMC denervation may be offered as a cost-effective surgical option for patients with persistent symptomatic thumb CMC arthritis, providing comparable clinical outcomes to trapeziectomy at lower cost while preserving future reconstructive alternatives.

Indexed as

CMC denervationCost-utility analysisQALYThumb carpometacarpal arthritisTrapeziectomy

Identifiers

PMID42899137
PMCPMC13679291

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.