ArticleACM transactions on computing for healthcare2026
Automatic Detection of Physiological Attributes from Verbal Communication During Time-Critical Medical Events.
Article in ACM transactions on computing for healthcare, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
In this study, we present a proof-of-concept system exploring the feasibility of automatically capturing physiological values during the primary survey phase of trauma resuscitation-a complex, time-sensitive evaluation of severely injured patients. We developed and evaluated a speech-driven activity recognition system designed to detect and extract key physiological parameters (e.g., age, manual blood pressure, Glasgow Coma Scale) from spoken clinical dialogue in real-time. By using audio recordings from actual trauma resuscitation cases, our system performs streaming inference to identify verbalized measurements associated with primary survey activities. Experimental results show that our approach can recognize seven attributes with an average accuracy of 72% in a challenging clinical environment with acceptable latency. We present this work as an initial feasibility demonstration rather than a deployment-ready system, highlighting both the opportunities and the remaining challenges of automating documentation in fast-paced emergency environments.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.