ArticleEuropean heart journal. Digital health2026
Deep learning-based echocardiography for cardiac assessment: a systematic literature review and meta-analysis.
Article in European heart journal. Digital health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Aims: Artificial intelligence, particularly deep learning (DL), has shown significant potential for enhancing the assessment of echocardiograms in clinical practice. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the performance of DL models and to identify factors affecting their performance. Methods and results: A systematic review of the PubMed, CENTRAL, and Web of Science databases was conducted, yielding 16 248 potential publications. Of these, 160 studies met the inclusion criteria. Only studies applying fully automated DL networks to echocardiographic loops were considered. Performance estimates were pooled using a random-effects meta-analysis. The studies were categorized into five distinct groups: prediction of disease or mortality, replication of established measures, segmentation of cardiac chambers, classification of chamber views, and assessment of image quality. High heterogeneity that could not be resolved was observed in studies focusing on cardiac chamber segmentation and classification. Model performance was influenced by a variety of different factors, including medical target and input characteristics such as video resolution, number of frames used, and total participants included during training. Conclusion: DL models achieve high performance across various applications in echocardiography. In selected tasks, they may reduce reliance on expert input and support greater automation of echocardiographic workflows. However, further validation, assessment of clinical utility, and evaluation in real-world settings are required before widespread clinical adoption.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.