Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42899076›Full record

ArticleCureus2026

Blood Donor Deferral Patterns at a Tertiary Care Hospital in Central India: A Retrospective Cross-Sectional Study.

Aditi Dad, Sunil Kumar Patidar, Komal Singh Likhar, Reetesh Kumar Gujar

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Aditi DadDepartment of Pathology, Dr. Laxminarayan Pandey Government Medical College, Ratlam, IND.
Sunil Kumar PatidarDepartment of Pathology, Dr. Laxminarayan Pandey Government Medical College, Ratlam, IND.
Komal Singh LikharDepartment of Pathology, Dr. Laxminarayan Pandey Government Medical College, Ratlam, IND.
Reetesh Kumar GujarDepartment of Pathology, Dr. Laxminarayan Pandey Government Medical College, Ratlam, IND.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background and aim Blood donor deferral is an essential safeguard for donors and recipients, but it also reduces the immediately available donor pool. Because deferral patterns reflect local demographics, health conditions, and screening practices, center-level data are important for donor recruitment and retention planning. The aim of this study was to evaluate the frequency, pattern, and causes of blood donor deferral among prospective donation presentations at a tertiary care teaching hospital in Central India. Methods A retrospective, record-based cross-sectional study was conducted at the Blood Centre of Dr. Laxminarayan Pandey Government Medical College, Ratlam. A recorded donation presentation was defined as an age-eligible prospective donor entered after initial age screening into either the Main Register following successful donation or the Deferral Register following pre-donation deferral. Individuals outside the center's routine age criterion of 18-60 years were screened at the initial counter and were not entered into either register. All 11,354 recorded donation presentations between March 2024 and March 2026 were included. Hemoglobin was screened using the copper sulfate specific-gravity method, with a minimum eligibility threshold of 12.5 g/dL for both male and female donors; the same screening procedure was used in in-house and blood donation camp sessions. Deferral reasons were standardized into predefined categories and classified as temporary or permanent; where more than one reason was documented, all recorded reasons were retained in the reason-specific analysis. Associations of sex, age group, and study period with deferral were assessed using Pearson's chi-square test or Fisher's exact test, as appropriate. Results Of 11,354 recorded donation presentations, 216 (1.9%; 95% CI, 1.7-2.2%) resulted in deferral. There were 10,219 male presentations (90.0%) and 1,135 female presentations (10.0%). Deferral rates did not differ significantly between male (188/10,219, 1.8%) and female (28/1,135, 2.5%) presentations (p = 0.142). Most deferrals were temporary (193/216, 89.4%), while 23/216 (10.6%) were permanent. Self-reported alcohol intake within the preceding 72 hours (37/193, 19.2%) and low hemoglobin (27/193, 14.0%) were the leading temporary causes, while cardiovascular disease was the most frequent permanent cause (7/23). Deferral rates were 73/3,143 (2.3%) in March-December 2024, 70/6,233 (1.1%) in January-December 2025, and 73/1,978 (3.7%) in January-March 2026 (χ²(2) = 57.15, p < 0.001). Conclusions Among recorded donor presentations after initial age screening, 216/11,354 (1.9%) resulted in deferral, and most deferrals were temporary. Recent alcohol intake and low hemoglobin were the most frequent temporary causes and represent practical targets for pre-donation guidance, appropriate clinical evaluation when indicated, and structured reentry of temporarily deferred donors.

Indexed as

blood donation analysisblood donordonor deferralhemoglobintemporary deferraltransfusion medicine

Identifiers

PMID42899076
PMCPMC13678707

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.