ArticleJournal of the Saudi Heart Association2026
Position Statement by the Saudi Heart Failure Working Group of the Saudi Heart Association on the Management of Advanced Heart Failure in Saudi Arabia.
Article in Journal of the Saudi Heart Association, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Heart failure (HF) is a leading cause of morbidity and mortality in Saudi Arabia. Despite remarkable progress in guideline-directed medical therapy, a significant proportion of patients progress to advanced HF and require evaluation for heart transplantation or mechanical circulatory support (MCS). In response to this growing burden, the Saudi Heart Association (SHA) developed recommendations to guide identification, timely referral, and optimal management of candidates for advanced HF therapies in Saudi Arabia. Methods: A multidisciplinary panel of 10 HF experts from Saudi Arabia convened for a series of structured virtual meetings to review local and international evidence. The panel integrated Saudi-specific clinical practice patterns and healthcare considerations into the deliberation process. Consensus was achieved through discussion and majority agreement. Recommendations were formulated using the SHA methodology, supported by a comprehensive literature review of published evidence. Results and conclusions: The SHA consensus establishes a structured, comprehensive framework for recognizing advanced HF, optimizing guideline-directed therapy, and determining candidacy for heart transplantation or MCS in tertiary and quaternary centers in Saudi Arabia. The document emphasizes timely prognostic stratification using clinical indicators and standardized tools such as INTERMACS and SCAI classifications. Referral pathways and multidisciplinary coordination are delineated to facilitate efficient evaluation and timely intervention. These recommendations aim to minimize delays in referral, expand access to advanced HF therapies and improve patient outcomes across Saudi Arabia.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.