ArticleJournal of cytology
Two-Dimensional Plot of the Image Analysis of Ovarian Tumor Peritoneal Cytology Specimens to Distinguish Malignant from Negative Cases.
Article in Journal of cytology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective and Methods: Computer-assisted image analysis (CAIA) was used to analyze Papanicolaou-stained peritoneal cytology specimens from 142 patients with ovarian tumors. A two-dimensional plot was then created with the area of the cell/cell cluster on the x-axis and the maximum value of the connected nuclear area within that cell/cell cluster on the y-axis, after which the patterns were classified. Results: Ovarian cancer positive cases displayed a predominantly vertical pattern (V-type) or a diagonal pattern (D-type) cell/cell cluster plots, whereas the majority of the negative cases showed a small cluster pattern (S-type) or a horizontal pattern (H-type). In suspicious cases, almost equal frequencies of V-, D-, and S-types were observed. We found that V- and D-type patterns in negative cases were attributed to the presence of clusters of mesothelial cells, lymphocytes, and histiocytes. However, the amount of cell clusters in the area where positive cells were distributed (positivity rate) was significantly lower in both negative and suspicious cases than in positive cases. Evaluating the plot pattern and positivity rate together allowed us to reliably distinguish between malignant and negative cases. Conclusion: Although previous CAIA of cytological specimens has fundamentally focused on nuclear area, morphology, and color evaluation, our method of combining cell/cell cluster area and the connected nuclear area in two dimensions reflects a part of the algorithm used by humans in cytological diagnosis and can become a promising analytical method in the near future. This study highlights the importance of actively incorporating diagnostic indicators used by humans into CAIA.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.