ArticleJournal of global infectious diseases
The UK Health System's Response to the Monkeypox Outbreak of 2022: A Scoping Review.
Article in Journal of global infectious diseases. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: The 2022 mpox outbreak represented a major shift in transmission dynamics, with sustained community spread occurring in several nonendemic countries, including the United Kingdom. Examining how nonendemic health systems responded to this outbreak is essential for strengthening preparedness for future emerging and re-emerging infectious diseases. Methods: A scoping review was conducted in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic and Meta-Analysis Extension for Scoping Reviews guidelines to synthesize evidence on the UK healthcare system's response to the 2022 mpox outbreak. Electronic databases and gray literature sources were searched for publications released between January and December 2022. Results: Evidence was mapped across seven World Health Organization-aligned intervention domains relevant to outbreak preparedness and response. Eleven sources were included, comprising peer-reviewed studies and policy-relevant gray literature. Evidence was most frequently reported for infection prevention and control ( Conclusion: The UK response to the 2022 mpox outbreak demonstrated timely coordination, effective surveillance, and implementation of infection prevention measures in a nonendemic setting. However, important limitations remain, particularly in workforce surge capacity, domestic vaccine manufacturing, and evidence on postexposure vaccination effectiveness. Addressing these gaps is essential for strengthening health system resilience and preparedness for future outbreaks.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.