ArticleProceedings of SPIE--the International Society for Optical Engineering2025
Prediction of Disease Quantification via PET/CT Images and Auto-Segmentation of Target Objects.
Article in Proceedings of SPIE--the International Society for Optical Engineering, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
In this paper, we propose a deep learning-based disease quantification (DQ) method which predicts object-level total lesion burden (TLB) of target objects from segmentations derived by automatic methods on PET/CT images. Our approach employs a U-Net shaped network using CT images, standardized SUV images, and delineated object mask as three-channel input, and predicted segmentation mask and lesion map (LM) as two-channel output. Ground truth LM is generated based on normality distribution of metabolic activities of the object, and the loss function is a weighted sum of segmentation loss, LM loss, and TLB loss. We evaluated the method on clinical datasets comprising 58 PET/CT scans, covering five organs and five lymph node zones. 3-fold cross-validation experiments were conducted using both manual and auto-segmented masks. Results show that the proposed method achieves clinically acceptable errors, where half of experiments showed errors below 15% and most of the remainder with errors under 30%. Our method demonstrates a solution for automated DQ from PET/CT images, potentially reducing manual effort while maintaining clinically meaningful accuracy and reproducibility.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.