Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42898961›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in oncology2026

Autophagy as an adaptive resistance mechanism to epigenetic therapy in cancer.

Natalie L Hakim, John Thomas Gialluisi, Sruthi Sureshkumar, Madison E Gamble, Claudia M Espitia, Kevin R Kelly, Jennifer S Carew, Steffan T Nawrocki

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Natalie L HakimDivision of Translational Medicine, Department of Medicine and University of Arizona Cancer Center, Tucson, AZ, United States.
John Thomas GialluisiDivision of Translational Medicine, Department of Medicine and University of Arizona Cancer Center, Tucson, AZ, United States.
Sruthi SureshkumarDivision of Translational Medicine, Department of Medicine and University of Arizona Cancer Center, Tucson, AZ, United States.
Madison E GambleDivision of Translational Medicine, Department of Medicine and University of Arizona Cancer Center, Tucson, AZ, United States.
Claudia M EspitiaDivision of Translational Medicine, Department of Medicine and University of Arizona Cancer Center, Tucson, AZ, United States.
Kevin R KellyDivision of Hematology, University of Southern California Keck School of Medicine, Los Angeles, CA, United States.
Jennifer S CarewDivision of Translational Medicine, Department of Medicine and University of Arizona Cancer Center, Tucson, AZ, United States.
Steffan T NawrockiDivision of Translational Medicine, Department of Medicine and University of Arizona Cancer Center, Tucson, AZ, United States.

Funding

VITAMIN AP30CA023074 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA · PI Dan Theodorescu · 1985 to 2026
$110.2M
Targeting Lysosomal Vulnerabilities in Renal PathogenesisR01CA268383 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA · PI Jennifer S Carew, Steffan T Nawrocki · 2022 to 2026
$2.4M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA023074NCI NIH HHS R01 CA268383
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Epigenetic therapies can reverse malignant transcriptional programs, but their activity is often constrained by adaptive stress responses that allow cancer cells to survive and recover. Autophagy is a central component of this adaptation. By sustaining metabolic homeostasis, mitochondrial fitness, proteostasis, and lysosomal recycling, autophagy can buffer the cellular injury produced by inhibitors of DNA methyltransferases, histone deacetylases, and bromodomain proteins. These observations provide a strong rationale for combining epigenetic therapies with autophagy inhibition. However, the field has too often equated autophagosome accumulation with increased autophagic flux and treatment-induced autophagy with a functional dependency. Moreover, the lysosomotropic agents used in early clinical studies incompletely inhibit autophagy and exert broader effects on lysosomal biology. Consequently, compelling preclinical activity has not translated into consistent clinical benefit. Here, we critically evaluate the mechanisms through which epigenetic therapies engage autophagy, distinguish correlative markers from causal evidence of resistance, and assess the preclinical and clinical data supporting combination strategies. We also define the major barriers to translation, including inadequate pharmacodynamic assays, a lack of predictive biomarkers, context-dependent effects on tumor and immune cells, and the limited potency and selectivity of current autophagy inhibitors. Defining when, where, and how autophagy becomes a targetable dependency will be essential to translate this compelling biology into an effective precision treatment.

Indexed as

autophagycancerdrug resistanceepigenetic regulationtumor adaptation

Identifiers

PMID42898961
PMCPMC13678483

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.