ReviewFrontiers in public health2026
Potential risk of occupational exposure to respirable crystalline silica in Saudi Arabia: a comprehensive review of the current status and future challenges.
Review in Frontiers in public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Respirable crystalline silica (RCS) is a major occupational health hazard associated with silicosis, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), lung cancer, autoimmune diseases, and other systemic disorders. Saudi Arabia is undergoing rapid industrial expansion in sectors with substantial potential for RCS exposure, including mining, construction, cement production, glass manufacturing, oil and gas, engineered stone fabrication, and photovoltaic manufacturing. This review evaluates the potential risk of occupational RCS exposure in Saudi Arabia by integrating evidence from the scientific literature, government reports, labor and mining statistics, mineralogical data, and regulatory documents. The novel silica Hazard triangle framework was applied to assess three principal determinants of occupational exposure: workforce distribution, silica-containing materials, and high-risk industrial activities. Saudi Arabia possesses extensive reserves of high-purity silica sand, and continued expansion of mining and downstream silica-based industries may increase occupational exposure potential. The kingdom's arid climate may also contribute to dust generation and increase the occupational exposure of RCS. Although documented cases of silicosis confirm that silica-related disease exists in Saudi Arabia, published evidence on occupational exposure assessment, epidemiology, and health surveillance remains limited. International regulatory developments demonstrate the importance of health-based occupational exposure limits (OELs), exposure monitoring, engineering controls, and medical surveillance. Current Saudi labor law, National Council for occupational safety and health (NCOSH) policies, and General Organization for Social Insurance (GOSI) occupational disease frameworks provide an important legal and institutional foundation for the future development of silica-specific occupational health regulations. This review identifies important knowledge gaps and highlights the need for comprehensive exposure assessment, strengthened industrial hygiene capacity, and evidence-based regulatory strategies to reduce the future burden of silica-related diseases while supporting sustainable industrial development in Saudi Arabia.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.