Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42898924›Full record

ArticlePLOS water2026

Wildfire mobilization of arsenic into water resources: A scoping review of current literature.

Jordan Willeford, Leigh Moorhead, Kai Malone, Alexis Payton, Janice S Lee, Julia E Rager, Stephen D LeDuc

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLOS water, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Jordan WillefordDepartment of Environmental Sciences and Engineering, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States of America.
Leigh MoorheadUnited States Environmental Protection Agency, Durham, North Carolina, United States of America.
Kai MaloneDepartment of Environmental Sciences and Engineering, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0001-6571-2445
Alexis PaytonDepartment of Environmental Sciences and Engineering, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States of America.
Janice S LeeUnited States Environmental Protection Agency, Durham, North Carolina, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-4331-8452
Julia E RagerDepartment of Environmental Sciences and Engineering, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-2882-5042
Stephen D LeDucUnited States Environmental Protection Agency, Durham, North Carolina, United States of America.

Funding

Wildland Urban Interface Exposure Toxicity in Cells, Animals, and HumansR01ES035878 · NIEHS · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI Julia Rager · 2024 to 2026
$2.2M
Intramural EPA EPA999999NIEHS NIH HHS R01 ES035878
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Increasing wildfire activity poses a threat to water resources via the mobilization of hazardous materials such as arsenic (As). While As contamination of water resources is well studied, the fate and transport of As impacted by wildfire are not well characterized. This literature review synthesizes studies addressing the questions of: (1) Does fuel type influence how As is mobilized by wildfire?; (2) What mobilization pathways are most common for As when impacted by wildfires?; and (3) How are surface and groundwater As concentrations impacted by wildfire mobilization of As? To address this goal, articles were queried using Boolean search strings in Google Scholar, PubMed, and Web of Science and screened for relevance using PECO (Population, Exposure, Comparator, and Outcome) criteria. Twenty articles met the criteria, showing wildfire mobilization of As and changes in concentrations or loading of As to surface or groundwater. The majority of studies (16 of 20) showed an increase or a likely increase in As in waterbodies post-wildfire. Runoff to surface water was by far the dominant pathway. Average values typically did not exceed drinking water standards, although six studies reported instances where this occurred, with one reporting exceedances in treated drinking water itself. The largest value of dissolved As reported across surveyed literature (70 μg/L) was measured downgradient of a legacy mining operation post-wildfire. Higher values were also observed downstream of burned agricultural or urban areas, illustrating how human activities concentrate As, which can then be subsequently mobilized by wildfire. In contrast to surface water, groundwater impacts were inconsistent in the limited literature, with one study showing an increase in post-wildfire As, while the other two studies showed no-change. Overall, these results suggest communities may need to test drinking water supplies for As following wildfire, especially in cases where mining, agricultural, or urbanized areas are burned.

Identifiers

PMID42898924
PMCPMC13679690

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.