Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42898857›Full record

ArticleJournal of animal science and technology2026

Meta-analysis with batch-effect adjustment reveals breed-specific ruminal microbiome variation of beef cattle and its implications for meat quality and productivity.

Ryukseok Kang, Chaemin Yu, Yeonsue Gwon, Sangmin Lee, Joohyuk Yang, Jongsik Jeong, Geonwoo Kim, Woohyung Lee, Wanho Jo, Myeong-Gwan Oh and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of animal science and technology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Ryukseok KangDepartment of Animal Science and Technology, Chung-Ang University, Anseong, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0001-6202-1283
Chaemin YuDepartment of Animal Science and Technology, Chung-Ang University, Anseong, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0000-6275-800X
Yeonsue GwonDepartment of Animal Science and Technology, Chung-Ang University, Anseong, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0004-1899-2359
Sangmin LeeDepartment of Animal Science and Technology, Chung-Ang University, Anseong, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0005-0187-1347
Joohyuk YangDepartment of Animal Science and Technology, Chung-Ang University, Anseong, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0002-5496-0341
Jongsik JeongDepartment of Animal Science and Technology, Chung-Ang University, Anseong, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0002-8660-5598
Geonwoo KimDepartment of Animal Science and Technology, Chung-Ang University, Anseong, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0003-8080-5860
Woohyung LeeDepartment of Animal Science and Technology, Chung-Ang University, Anseong, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0004-4243-0188
Wanho JoDepartment of Animal Science and Technology, Chung-Ang University, Anseong, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0006-9607-550X
Myeong-Gwan OhDepartment of Animal Science and Technology, Chung-Ang University, Anseong, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0007-2021-0143
Changbeen JangDepartment of Animal Science and Technology, Chung-Ang University, Anseong, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0007-9771-5342
Mekonnen TilahunDepartment of Animal Science and Technology, Chung-Ang University, Anseong, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9894-2562
Joonpyo OhCargill Animal Nutrition, Seongnam, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1906-5520
Tansol ParkDepartment of Animal Science and Technology, Chung-Ang University, Anseong, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4480-4524

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Various beef cattle breeds are raised in different countries. Hanwoo and Wagyu breeds are primarily raised in Korea and Japan, respectively, whereas Angus breed is one of the most widely bred beef cattle breed worldwide. Although microbiome studies have been conducted for each breed, comparative analyses of the ruminal microbiome and their functions across breeds remain limited. Moreover, the potential links between the ruminal microbiome and animal traits related to meat quality and productivity have not been studied. Based on 13 studies comprising 954 samples (Hanwoo: 384, Angus: 246, Wagyu: 324) with the application of an optimal batch-effect adjustment tool, this meta-analysis aimed to compare the ruminal microbiome across Hanwoo, Angus, and Wagyu and explore potential associations between breed-specific microbiome profiles and key phenotypic traits, such as meat quality and production performance. The overall microbial composition at the phylum, genus, and Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) ortholog levels was effectively adjusted batch-effect using the selected adjustment tool (ConQuR). Subsequent analyses were conducted using batch-effect adjusted microbiome data to investigate the breed-specific differences. Cellulolytic bacteria such as

Indexed as

Batch-effect adjustmentMeta-analysisMethanogenesisMicrobiomeRuminant productivity

Identifiers

PMID42898857
PMCPMC13678367

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.