Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42898829›Full record

ReviewOpen forum infectious diseases2026

Fungal Periprosthetic Joint Infection: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Treatment Approaches and Clinical Outcomes.

Farzad Pourghazi, Seyed Mohammad Amin Alavi, Takahiro Matsuo, Georges Baaklini, Matthew P Abdel, Aaron J Tande, Elie F Berbari

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Open forum infectious diseases, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Farzad PourghaziDivision of Public Health, Infectious Diseases and Occupational Medicine, Department of Medicine, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine and Science, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9684-1466
Seyed Mohammad Amin AlaviFaculty of Medicine, Ahvaz Jundishapur University of Medical Sciences, Ahvaz, Iran.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7885-6691
Takahiro MatsuoDepartment of Infectious Diseases, Infection Control, and Employee Health, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA.
Georges BaakliniFaculty of Medicine, Saint Joseph University, Beirut, Lebanon.
Matthew P AbdelDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2398-1724
Aaron J TandeDivision of Public Health, Infectious Diseases and Occupational Medicine, Department of Medicine, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine and Science, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9775-7082
Elie F BerbariDivision of Public Health, Infectious Diseases and Occupational Medicine, Department of Medicine, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine and Science, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Fungal periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) is a rare but serious complication of joint arthroplasty, with variable management and poorly defined outcomes. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis in accordance with PRISMA guidelines, searching Ovid MEDLINE, Embase, Scopus, and Ovid Cochrane Central. Cohort studies were included in the quantitative synthesis, while case reports and series were reviewed qualitatively. Outcomes were treatment success, failure, reinfection, and mortality. We included 160 studies: 42 cohort studies and 118 case reports or case series, with 1025 fungal PJI cases. Pooled rates were 66.5% for treatment success, 36.5% for failure, 16.6% for reinfection, and 9.6% for mortality. Success and failure were extracted independently using study-specific definitions and are not necessarily complementary. Treatment-strategy estimates were descriptive; studies reporting DAIR had lower pooled success, but findings should be interpreted cautiously because of differences in patient selection, study design, and outcome definitions. These findings cannot establish comparative effectiveness.

Indexed as

exchange arthroplastyfungal prosthetic joint infectionmeta-analysisoutcome

Identifiers

PMID42898829
PMCPMC13678226

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.