SynthesisFrontiers in physiology2026
Effects of brain endurance training on cognitive function, physical performance and perceived exertion in healthy adults: a systematic review and three-level meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Frontiers in physiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Mental fatigue impairs cognitive function and physical performance in healthy adults. Brain endurance training (BET) has emerged as a strategy to enhance resistance to mental fatigue and improve both cognitive and physical outcomes; however, its effects have not been comprehensively synthesized. Objective: To systematically assess the effects of BET on cognitive function, physical performance, and perceived exertion in healthy adults. Methods: Searches were conducted in PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, Cochrane Library, and SPORTDiscus on September 9, 2025. Data (mean ± standard deviation and sample size) were extracted, and pooled effects were calculated as Hedges'g using random-effects meta-analysis models. Subgroup and meta-regression analyses were performed to explore potential moderators. Results: Eleven studies (13 trials; n=441 participants) were included. BET significantly improved cognitive function (g = 0.64, 95% CI [0.24, 1.04], P = 0.006) and physical performance (g = 0.48, 95% CI [0.33, 0.62], p<0.001), whereas no statistically significant effect was observed for perceived exertion (g = -0.01, 95% CI [-0.25, 0.23]). Effects on cognitive function and physical performance appeared larger under mental-fatigue than non-fatigued testing conditions. Evidence for other potential moderators was inconclusive, and intervention duration was not significantly associated with any outcome. The certainty of evidence was low for cognitive function and physical performance and moderate for perceived exertion. Conclusion: BET was associated with improvements in cognitive function and physical performance in healthy adults, with effects appearing larger under mental-fatigue testing conditions. BET had no statistically significant effect on perceived exertion. Given the limited number of studies and low certainty of evidence for the primary performance outcomes, these findings should be interpreted cautiously.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.