Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42898798›Full record

ArticleCureus2026

Comparison of Laparoscopic-Assisted Transversus Abdominis Plane Block and Trocar-Site Local Anesthetic Infiltration After Laparoscopic Appendectomy: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

İksan Taşdelen, Fatih Kilic, Kemal Memişoğlu, Ahmet Yalin Iscan, Bülent Kaya, Arzu Yildirim Ar

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

İksan TaşdelenGeneral Surgery, Fatih Sultan Mehmet Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul, TUR.
Fatih KilicSurgery, Fatih Sultan Mehmet Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul, TUR.
Kemal MemişoğluGeneral Surgery, Fatih Sultan Mehmet Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul, TUR.
Ahmet Yalin IscanGeneral Surgery, Istanbul University - Çapa, Istanbul, TUR.
Bülent KayaGeneral Surgery, Istanbul Rumeli University, Istanbul, TUR.
Arzu Yildirim ArAnesthesiology and Reanimation, Fatih Sultan Mehmet Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul, TUR.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

objectiveAbdominal wall blocks are increasingly used for pain control following laparoscopic appendectomy. This study aimed to compare the analgesic efficacy of a transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block performed by the surgical team under direct laparoscopic visualization with trocar-site infiltration using an equal total dose of local anesthetic (LA). MATERIALS AND

methodsSixty patients who underwent laparoscopic appendectomy for uncomplicated acute appendicitis between August 2017 and January 2018 were prospectively randomized in a 1:1 ratio into two groups. In the TAP group (n = 30), 15 mL of 0.25% bupivacaine was administered bilaterally under direct laparoscopic visualization before appendectomy. In the LA group (n = 30), 5 mL of 0.5% bupivacaine was infiltrated at each trocar site before incision. The total bupivacaine dose was standardized to 75 mg in both groups. Pain intensity was measured using the visual analog scale (VAS) at postoperative hours 0, 2, 6, 12, and 24. The two groups were compared in terms of rescue analgesic consumption; time to first mobilization, first passage of flatus, and initiation of oral intake; nausea and vomiting; complications; and length of hospital stay.

resultsThe groups were comparable in terms of age, sex, body mass index, and American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score (all p > 0.05). VAS scores were significantly lower in the TAP group at all measured time points (hour 0, p = 0.005; hour 2, p = 0.022; hour 6, p = 0.020; hour 12, p = 0.020; and hour 24, p = 0.001; effect sizes, r = 0.34-0.49). In the TAP group, 19 of 30 patients (63.3%) required no rescue analgesia during the first 24 hours, compared with 11 of 30 (36.7%) in the LA group (p = 0.039); the total number of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) doses per patient was significantly lower in the TAP group (p = 0.023). Although opioid requirements were numerically lower in the TAP group, the difference did not reach statistical significance (2/30, 6.7% vs. 7/30, 23.3%; p = 0.071). Oral intake was initiated earlier in the TAP group (median, 8.0 vs. 10.0 hours; p = 0.018). The median length of hospital stay was 24.0 hours in the TAP group and 32.0 hours in the LA group (p = 0.002), and the proportions of patients discharged within 24 hours were 16 of 30 (53.3%) and 3 of 30 (10.0%), respectively (p < 0.001). No differences were observed between the groups in mobilization, passage of flatus, or the frequency of nausea and vomiting. No complications related to block administration were observed.

conclusionsA surgeon-performed TAP block under laparoscopic visualization provides lower pain scores and reduces analgesic consumption during the first 24 hours following laparoscopic appendectomy compared with trocar-site infiltration using an equal dose of LA. As it requires neither additional equipment nor ultrasonographic expertise, this technique represents a feasible option in emergency surgical practice.

Indexed as

abdominal wall blocklaparoscopic appendectomylocal anesthetic infiltrationmultimodal analgesiaopioid-sparing analgesiapostoperative paintransversus abdominis plane block

Identifiers

PMID42898798
PMCPMC13678998

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.