Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42898795›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in immunology2026

The blood-brain tumor barrier as a spatial immune checkpoint in glioblastoma: leukocyte entry, perivascular retention, and therapeutic implications.

Fangbo Lin

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in immunology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Fangbo LinRehabilitation Medicine Department, The Affiliated Changsha Hospital of Xiangya School of Medicine, Central South University, Changsha, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Glioblastoma (GBM) combines heterogeneous vascular dysfunction with a predominantly myeloid immune landscape. This Mini Review focuses on a specific problem: vascular permeability is not equivalent to productive leukocyte access. Entry requires endothelial capture, chemokine-guided arrest, transendothelial migration, release from perivascular sites, intratumoral dispersion, target recognition, and sustained effector function. Human tissue and spatial studies show regionally distinct neurovascular and myeloid states, whereas much of the causal evidence for trafficking and retention remains preclinical. We therefore distinguish published observations from a hypothesis-generating model in which the blood-brain tumor barrier (BBTB) and perivascular myeloid niche can act as coupled but separable checkpoints. The main conceptual advance is not the already recognized heterogeneity of the BBTB, but the argument that leakage-based imaging should not be used as a surrogate for immune-cell entry and that each trafficking stage requires its own pharmacodynamic readout. We summarize regional BBTB states, differential lymphoid and myeloid access, and selected strategies-vascular normalization, myeloid reprogramming, local cell delivery, and focused ultrasound-while emphasizing their evidence limits. Clinical translation will require spatially registered human sampling, explicit model provenance, and tests that can reject individual components of the framework.

Indexed as

Blood-Brain BarrierBrain NeoplasmsGlioblastomaLeukocytesAnimalsCapillary PermeabilityHumansTumor Microenvironmentblood-brain tumor barrierglioblastomaimmunotherapy resistanceleukocyte traffickingneurovascular unitperivascular myeloid nichesspatial immune checkpointtumor-associated macrophages

Identifiers

PMID42898795
PMCPMC13678291

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.