ReviewFrontiers in immunology2026
Beyond combination: sequencing priming modalities before immune checkpoint inhibitors to convert immunologically cold tumors toward an ICI-responsive phenotype.
Review in Frontiers in immunology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Immune checkpoint inhibitors have transformed oncology but largely spare immunologically "cold" tumors, those with sparse T-cell infiltration, low PD-L1 expression, and an immunosuppressive microenvironment. The prevailing response has been a combination: adding a priming modality to a checkpoint inhibitor, most often concurrently. We argue that this "addition" paradigm has plateaued in cold disease because it treats combination as arithmetic rather than as a temporally ordered program, and that timing, the order and interval of interventions, may govern outcome as much as the choice of agents. We first define what makes a tumor immunologically cold and why simultaneous stacking reaches a ceiling. We then assemble the clinical evidence that timing already shapes outcomes: most maturely in the scheduling of radiotherapy relative to checkpoint blockade and, strikingly, in neoadjuvant-versus-adjuvant immunotherapy, where the same agent changes outcome according to when it is given. We synthesize the temporal immunobiology that makes ordering matter-antigen release and dendritic-cell priming kinetics, the vascular-normalization window, compensatory adaptive-resistance windows, and the slow dynamics of the gut microbiome-and review, mechanism by mechanism, the timing evidence for microenvironment priming, checkpoint inhibition, and microbiome modulation, emphasizing that mistiming can be harmful rather than merely ineffective. We describe how several groups are translating this principle into integrated, time-sequenced strategies and set out, as one concrete and falsifiable instantiation, a three-axis schema, which we term TMEp-CI-M, illustrated by cross-tumor proof-of-concept experience and framed as hypothesis-generating rather than validated. A therapy built on timing will require dynamic biomarkers of window state and adaptive, biomarker-driven trials. For cold tumors, re-sequencing the agents we already have, rather than adding new ones, may be among the highest-yield and lowest-cost hypotheses in immuno-oncology and one that can be tested now.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.