Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42898782›Full record

ArticleERJ open research2026

Development and external validation of a risk prediction tool for recurrent wheeze attacks in preschool children in England.

Jonathan Broomfield, Erol A Gaillard, Jennifer K Quint, Hilary Pinnock, Clare L Gillies, Mohammad A Al Sallakh, Gwyneth A Davies, David K H Lo

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in ERJ open research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Jonathan BroomfieldDivision of Respiratory Sciences, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1846-2150
Erol A GaillardDivision of Respiratory Sciences, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK.
Jennifer K QuintSchool of Public Health, Imperial College London, London, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0149-4869
Hilary PinnockUsher Institute, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5976-8386
Clare L GilliesLeicester Real World Evidence Unit, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK.
Mohammad A Al SallakhPopulation Data Science, Faculty of Medicine, Health and Life Science, Swansea University, Swansea, UK.
Gwyneth A DaviesPopulation Data Science, Faculty of Medicine, Health and Life Science, Swansea University, Swansea, UK.
David K H LoDivision of Respiratory Sciences, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK.

Funding

Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Almost half of all children experience wheeze before their sixth birthday, with a subset experiencing recurrent attacks that increase healthcare burden. Early identification of children at high risk could enable timely interventions, but diagnostic tools are limited. The aim of the present study was to develop and validate a prognostic model predicting the risk of recurrent wheeze attacks (primary outcome) and hospitalisations (secondary outcome) within 12 months of an initial preschool acute wheeze presentation. Methods: We developed a multivariable logistic regression model using primary care data from 42 820 children in England aged up to 5 years with acute wheeze episodes recorded in the Clinical Practice Research Datalink. Predictors included demographics, clinical history and treatment patterns. The model was validated internally Results: In the CPRD development cohort, 39.6% experienced a subsequent wheeze attack and 17.4% were hospitalised. Key predictors were the healthcare setting of initial acute wheeze, prior wheeze history and reliever prescriptions; inhaled corticosteroid prescriptions reduced risk. The model demonstrated excellent calibration across internal bootstrap validation and two external validation cohorts (calibration slope=1.00, 0.94 and 0.86, respectively, calibration-in-the-large=0.00, 0.035 and -0.143) and moderate discrimination (C-statistic=0.634, 0.625 and 0.638 for wheeze). Conclusions: Using routinely collected data, the prognostic model shows strong calibration and moderate discrimination for predicting recurrent wheeze in preschool children. Implementation as a web tool could support early risk stratification and guide preventative management.

Identifiers

PMID42898782
PMCPMC13678849

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.