Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42898777›Full record

ArticleClinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.)2026

Outcomes of Simultaneous Three- or Four-Horizontal Muscle Surgery for Very Large-Angle Convergence Insufficiency-Type and Basic-Type Exotropia.

Ayaka Yagasaki, Teiji Yagasaki, Kazuo Ichikawa

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Ayaka Yagasaki *Yagasaki Eye Clinic, Ichinomiya, Aichi, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-3564-9825
Teiji Yagasaki *Yagasaki Eye Clinic, Ichinomiya, Aichi, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-0038-2884
Kazuo IchikawaChukyo Eye Clinic, Nagoya, Aichi, Japan.ORCID 0009-0001-6165-154X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: We investigated the outcomes of simultaneous three- or four-horizontal muscle surgery for very large-angle exotropia (> 60 prism diopters [Δ]). Subjects and Methods: This retrospective study included 24 patients (16 with convergence insufficiency-type and 8 with basic-type exotropia). The deviation angle was measured using the alternate prism and cover test, and stereopsis was evaluated. Patients were classified into three groups (F: ≤ 60 arcsec ("), C: 60"<, and N: nil stereoacuity). A successful motor outcome was defined as ≤ 10Δ of orthotropia. Pre- and postoperative results were compared. Results: Mean preoperative exodeviation at distance and near were 75.2 ± 13.0Δ and 89.2 ± 18.0Δ, respectively. Mean age at surgery was 47.8 ± 16.5 years, and mean follow-up period was 3.6 ± 4.2 years. Thirteen and 11 patients underwent four- and three-muscle surgeries, respectively. The mean distant and near deviations at 3 months postoperatively and at the final visit were 5.3 ± 10.4Δ and 8.4 ± 9.5Δ, 5.5 ± 8.6Δ and 9.4 ± 9.0Δ, respectively. No differences were found in the near and distant deviations between the two time points. The motor success rates at both time points were 63%. Stereopsis at the final visit improved significantly from F:4%, C:38%, and N:58% before surgery to F:38%, C:50% and N:13% at the final visit (P = 0.002, McNemar-Bowker test). Conclusions: Three- or four-horizontal muscle surgeries for very large-angle exotropia are effective in achieving favorable motor outcomes and stereopsis.

Indexed as

large-angle exotropiamotor outcomesensory outcomestereopsisthree- or four-horizontal muscle surgery

Identifiers

PMID42898777
PMCPMC13678120

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.