ArticleBeyoglu eye journal2026
Repeatability and Reliability of Corneal Tomography in Keratoconus Patients with Corneal Allogenic Intrastromal Ring Segments.
Article in Beyoglu eye journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: To assess the repeatability and reliability of anterior and posterior corneal measurements in keratoconus patients who underwent corneal allogenic intrastromal ring segment (CAIRS) implantation using a Scheimpflug-based tomography system. Methods: This prospective observational study included 42 eyes: 20 keratoconic eyes that had undergone CAIRS implantation and 22 healthy controls. All participants were imaged with the Pentacam HR (Oculus Optikgeräte GmbH, Germany). Each eye underwent three consecutive scans during a single session. Repeatability was evaluated using within-subject standard deviation (Sw), repeatability index (RI), and tolerance index (TI), and reliability was assessed using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC). A TI>0.36 was considered indicative of reduced repeatability. Results: Anterior corneal curvature parameters (K1 and K2) and pachymetric indices demonstrated excellent reliability (ICC>0.90) and acceptable repeatability (TI<0.36). In contrast, CAIRS-implanted eyes exhibited greater variability in Kmax, Kmean, anterior elevation, and several posterior corneal metrics, with TI values exceeding 0.36. Despite having high ICC values, posterior elevation showed the greatest variability. Pachymetry at the corneal vertex and the thinnest corneal thickness remained highly reproducible (TI 0.08 and 0.18, respectively), suggesting strong measurement accuracy. Conclusion: The implantation of CAIRS alters the shape of the cornea and decreases the repeatability of several tomography-derived metrics, especially posterior corneal indices and Kmax. Although overall reliability remains high, clinicians should cautiously interpret small postoperative changes in monitoring these parameters. Pachymetric measurements maintain excellent precision and can be reliably used for postoperative follow-up and progression assessment after CAIRS surgery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.