ArticleFrontiers in psychiatry2026
Mapping risk of gambling disorder in older adults: a neural network approach.
Article in Frontiers in psychiatry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and objectives: Gambling disorder (GD) in older adults remains insufficiently understood, despite growing concerns about gambling-related harm in older adulthood. Risk profiles and clinical presentations in this age group may differ from those typically described in younger or mixed-age samples, reflecting age-specific psychosocial contexts, health conditions, and life transitions. Traditional statistical approaches may be limited in their ability to model the complex, non-linear interplay among psychological, behavioral, and contextual factors. The present study aimed to apply neural network-based models to predict the presence and severity of GD in older adults. Methods: The study used a cross-sectional, single-center, case-control design. Data were obtained from adults aged 50 to 85 years, with 50 years adopted as a pragmatic lower threshold given the lack of consensus on defining older adulthood, comprising a clinical sample of 745 patients seeking treatment for gambling-related problems at a specialized treatment hospital unit, and a healthy control (HC) group of 136 participants without gambling-related problems, recruited at non-psychiatric hospital outpatient services. Results: A neural network (multilayer perceptron, MLP) with one hidden layer composed of eight neurons showed excellent discrimination between individuals with GD and healthy controls in the complete sample (AUC = 0.987, 90.4% specificity, 97.7% sensitivity, and 96.6% classification accuracy). In the independent holdout subset, the model yielded an AUC of 0.890, with 75.0% specificity, 96.2% sensitivity, and 93.3% classification accuracy (although these estimates should be interpreted cautiously because the holdout included only 12 healthy controls). Novelty seeking emerged as the strongest contributor to the model, followed by emotion regulation difficulties, particularly non-acceptance of emotional responses and reduced impulse control. Focusing exclusively on the clinical GD subsample, a second MLP including six hidden neurons indicated that overall psychological distress was the primary factor associated with disorder severity. Additional relevant contributors to GD included novelty seeking, gambling-related cognitive distortions, and lower self-directedness. Conclusion: The neural network models effectively classified GD and its severity in older adults, identifying a multifactorial pattern characterized by affective distress, emotion regulation difficulties, and distorted gambling-related beliefs. These findings highlight the potential of non-linear modeling to characterize patterns associated with GD in older adults, while the clinical utility of machine learning tools for age-sensitive detection and intervention remains preliminary and requires further validation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.