ArticleRevista panamericana de salud publica = Pan American journal of public health2026
Improving cardiovascular care in a resource-limited setting through the HEARTS initiative in Suriname, 2022 to 2025.
Article in Revista panamericana de salud publica = Pan American journal of public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To evaluate early implementation of the HEARTS initiative in Suriname (2022-2025), identify key barriers and facilitators, and assess initial program performance. Methods: A mixed-methods implementation evaluation was conducted using the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) and the Reach, Effectiveness, Adoption, Implementation, and Maintenance framework (RE-AIM). Qualitative data were collected through structured monitoring, training and workshop feedback, and stakeholder consultations from December 2021 to December 2025, and analyzed deductively using predefined CFIR constructs. Quantitative indicators were assessed across RE-AIM domains, including reach, adoption, implementation fidelity, and early maintenance. Results: HEARTS was implemented in 56 primary health care facilities, involving 460 health care workers and 11 187 patients. Scale-up was rapid, with facilities increasing from 21 to 56 over six semesters. Among patients with follow-up measurements, blood pressure control improved from 47.0% to 56.2%. However, only 52.6% had at least one follow-up visit, indicating suboptimal continuity of care. Key facilitators included strong political commitment, standardized treatment protocols, and a real-time digital monitoring system. Major barriers were limited workforce capacity, infrastructure variability, and financial constraints affecting access to essential medications and equipment. Conclusions: Early HEARTS implementation in Suriname shows that rapid scale-up of standardized cardiovascular care is feasible in a mixed public-private system. Strengthening follow-up, workforce capacity, and sustainable financing are essential to achieve long-term effectiveness and population-level impact.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.