ArticleResearch (Washington, D.C.)2026
Effect of Microcurrent Stimulation on Cartilage Regeneration in Engineered Chondrocyte Spheroids.
Article in Research (Washington, D.C.), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Microcurrent stimulation has emerged as a promising biophysical cue for cartilage regeneration, but its dose-dependent effects in 3-dimensional engineered cartilage constructs remain unclear. Here, we investigated the effects of continuous direct microcurrent stimulation on auricular chondrocytes and engineered cartilage spheroids using 0-, 10-, 25-, 50-, 100-, and 200-μA stimulation for 30 min daily. In 2-dimensional culture, microcurrent stimulation did not markedly increase the DNA content or Cell Counting Kit-8 value, indicating that it did not markedly promote cell expansion or overall metabolic activity. 5-Ethynyl-2'-deoxyuridine and Ki67 assays showed that low to moderate (<50 μA) stimulation had limited effects on proliferation, whereas 100 to 200 μA attenuated proliferative activity. Nevertheless, microcurrent stimulation enhanced chondrogenic marker expression in a biphasic manner, with type II collagen, SRY-box transcription factor 9, aggrecan, and cartilage oligomeric matrix protein increasing from 0 to 50 μA and declining from 50 to 200 μA. In 3-dimensional spheroids, 50 μA produced the most favorable morphology, cartilage-specific extracellular matrix deposition, mechanical properties, and hyaline cartilage-like phenotype. Excessive stimulation increased catabolic, inflammatory, and apoptosis-associated molecular responses without causing obvious cytotoxicity, apoptosis, reactive oxygen species production, temperature change, or pH alteration. Mechanistically, 50 μA induced coordinated Ca
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.