ArticleFrontiers in psychiatry2026
EEG signature in psychiatrist's subjective experience: a pilot study.
Article in Frontiers in psychiatry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: The Assessment of Clinician's Subjective Experience (ACSE) is a self-report questionnaire developed to evaluate clinicians' subjective experiences during patient interactions. While its psychometric properties and clinical validity have been supported, its neurobiological correlates have not yet been investigated. Methods: In this pilot study, two clinicians and ten patients participated in a three-phase protocol comprising: (1) a first clinical interview, (2) ACSE administration, and (3) listening to the audio recording of the first clinical interview. EEG activity was recorded from clinicians during both the first clinical interview and questionnaire administration. Neural data were analyzed in terms of relative power spectral density, node strength, and global efficiency computed from imaginary coherence. Results: Clinicians were psychiatrists, one male and one female. Seven patients were diagnosed with mixed anxiety and depressive disorder, and three with unspecified anxiety disorders. ACSE scores were highest for the Difficulty in attunement and Engagement dimensions, consistent with previous literature. EEG findings revealed dimension-specific and topographically distinct oscillatory patterns for only two ACSE dimensions: Difficulty in Attunement and Engagement. More limited evidence emerged for Disconfirmation. Functional connectivity analyses indicated different network profiles, characterized by differences in global efficiency patterns. Correlational analyses further identified significant associations between ACSE dimensions and EEG-derived features. Discussion: These preliminary findings provide initial evidence that clinicians' subjective experiences during clinical encounters could be associated with measurable neural signatures, offering a novel perspective on the neurobiological basis of intersubjective processes in clinical settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.