ReviewAddiction & health2026
Non-Invasive Approaches for Cotinine Detection: Enhancing Accessibility in Tobacco Use Monitoring.
Review in Addiction & health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Non-invasive approaches for cotinine detection have emerged as vital tools for enhancing access to tobacco use monitoring, addressing the pressing need for reliable, user-friendly methods in public health and clinical settings. This literature review explored various non-invasive testing methods, including saliva, urine, sweat patches, hair analysis, and breath analysis, highlighting their respective detection windows, accuracy, and feasibility. The review emphasizes the role of these methods in public health monitoring, particularly in identifying high-risk populations and facilitating smoking cessation programs. Furthermore, it discusses the implications of non-invasive testing for research on tobacco exposure and secondhand smoke, underscoring the importance of accurate data collection in shaping effective tobacco control policies. Despite the advantages, challenges such as sensitivity, specificity, and environmental factors affecting test results are critically examined. The review identifies areas for future research, including technological innovations and the potential for expanded use in low-resource settings. Ultimately, this review advocates integrating non-invasive cotinine detection methods into routine practice to improve health outcomes and promote informed decision-making about tobacco use.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.