ReviewJournal of inflammation research2026
Mechanical Compression-Induced Peripheral Neuropathic Pain: From Astrocyte Mechanosensing and Phenotypic Reprogramming to CCL2-CCR2 Axis-Targeted Therapies.
Review in Journal of inflammation research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Neuropathic pain (NP) arising from mechanical nerve compression is driven by central sensitization, in which reactive astrocytes and chemokine-mediated neuro-glial crosstalk act as master regulators. Among candidate chemokine axes, the C-C motif chemokine ligand 2 (CCL2) and its receptor, C-C chemokine receptor type 2 (CCR2), most directly couple astrocyte activation to nociceptive signaling, and aberrant activation of this axis is conserved across diverse compression paradigms. This review synthesizes current evidence on how mechanical compression is translated into persistent pain via astrocytes. We first outline the methodological foundations and anatomical diversity of compression models, together with advances and limitations in astrocyte profiling. We then trace how mechanosensitive receptors and ion channels initiate astrocytic activation and examine the multicellular origins of CCL2 and its intracellular and epigenetic regulation. Equally important are single-cell-resolved phenotypic heterogeneity beyond the A1/A2 dichotomy, sexual dimorphism in astrocytic versus microglial pathways and the collapse of homeostatic, non-inflammatory astrocyte functions. Downstream, astrocyte-derived CCL2 engages neuronal and microglial CCR2 and together with interleukin (IL) and tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α) cytokine cascades, drives feed-forward glial crosstalk and sensitization of spinal and supraspinal circuits. Building on this framework, we evaluate a range of strategies targeting the axis, spanning small-molecule inhibitors, natural products, gene-silencing and precision-delivery platforms, and combinatorial regimens. We also highlight the clinical translational gap, exemplified by the discontinued anti-CCL2 monoclonal antibody carlumab, the Phase II analgesic failure of the CCR2 antagonist AZD2423, the halted CCR2/CCR5 antagonist PF-04634817, and the absence of JAK inhibitors from pain randomized controlled trials. Finally, we identify three translational bottlenecks: limited tools for resolving astrocyte states in vivo, insufficient large-animal pharmacological validation, and compensatory chemokine-receptor redundancy. We further outline directions for next-generation, multi-modal interventions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.