ArticleAtherosclerosis plus2026
Clonal hematopoiesis is associated with adverse events in patients with high-grade carotid artery stenosis.
Article in Atherosclerosis plus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Clonal hematopoiesis (CH), defined as the expansion of a subset of hematopoietic stem or progenitor cells driven by acquired mutations, represents a novel cardiovascular risk factor. Its role in patients with high-grade carotid stenosis remains to be evaluated. Patients and methods: Next-generation sequencing (NGS) involving 30 genes implicated in CH was used as diagnostic-grade assay (SOPHiA DDM Myeloid Solution) to screen for CH in 83 prospectively collected patients with symptomatic or asymptomatic high-grade carotid stenosis undergoing carotid endarterectomy (CEA). Results: Clonal markers were detected in 16 (19.7 %) of 83 patients (median age 71.2 years), with prevalence increasing at advanced age. At 5-year follow-up, CH carriers showed a higher cumulative incidence of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE; P = 0.040) compared to patients without CH; all-cause mortality did not differ significantly between groups (P = 0.57). Cox regression revealed a significant association between CH and MACE in a univariable model (P = 0.047), which remained significant after multivariable adjustment for age and sex (P = 0.018). Exploratory analyses suggested that the association between CH and MACE may differ according to carotid stenosis severity, with an increased incidence of MACE observed in patients with <90 % stenosis and concomitant CH, an effect absent in patients with ≥90 % stenosis ( Discussion and conclusions: CH was associated with an adverse 5-year outcome in patients with carotid artery stenosis. These findings identify CH as a hematologic contributor to post-interventional cardiovascular risk and indicate that assessment of CH may offer additional prognostic information for residual risk stratification.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.