ReviewFrontiers in neurology2026
Neuromelanin-sensitive magnetic resonance imaging in the diagnosis and assessment of Parkinson's disease.
Review in Frontiers in neurology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Parkinson's disease (PD) is a progressive neurodegenerative disorder characterized primarily by the progressive loss of dopaminergic neurons in the substantia nigra pars compacta (SNpc); noradrenergic neurons in the locus coeruleus (LC) are also frequently affected. Because clinical motor symptoms usually emerge only after substantial neurodegeneration has occurred, there is a compelling need for noninvasive imaging biomarkers capable of detecting early pathological changes. Neuromelanin-sensitive magnetic resonance imaging (NM-MRI) generates neuromelanin-related image contrast in the SNpc and LC and can indirectly reflect the structural integrity of these catecholaminergic nuclei. Current evidence suggests that NM-MRI may be useful for distinguishing patients with PD from healthy controls, supporting the differential diagnosis of selected atypical parkinsonian syndromes and essential tremor, assessing disease stage, monitoring longitudinal change, and evaluating high-risk individuals in the prodromal phase. This review provides an updated account of recent advances in the use of NM-MRI for diagnostic support, differential diagnosis, prodromal assessment, longitudinal monitoring, multimodal imaging, and artificial intelligence-based analysis, and discusses its clinical role relative to other imaging and fluid biomarkers. Combining NM-MRI with complementary imaging measures, such as quantitative susceptibility mapping and diffusion MRI, and with automated analytical methods may further enhance pathological characterization and quantitative assessment. However, the available evidence is derived largely from single-center or case-control studies with limited sample sizes. Substantial variability may arise from differences in scanners, magnetic field strengths, acquisition protocols, and analytical methods, while independent external validation and prospective multicenter longitudinal evidence remain limited. The biological basis of the NM-MRI signal has not been fully established, and artificial intelligence models developed for NM-MRI remain vulnerable to overfitting, limited interpretability, and limited cross-center generalizability. Accordingly, NM-MRI cannot currently serve as a stand-alone diagnostic tool for PD or replace diagnosis based on comprehensive clinical assessment. It is better regarded as a promising complementary imaging biomarker and research tool. Before NM-MRI can be widely used for routine clinical diagnosis, disease monitoring, or as a clinical trial outcome measure, acquisition and analytical methods must be further standardized, and its performance must be evaluated in large, prospective, multicenter longitudinal studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.