ArticleJournal of animal science and technology2026
Evaluation of scaffold properties for cell-cultured food based on protein sources and their mixtures.
Article in Journal of animal science and technology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
For cultured meat applications, the development of protein-based scaffolds is essential to produce sustainable edible materials with suitable textures and functionalities. In this study, scaffolds were fabricated using various plant-based protein sources, including soybean (gel-based soybean protein scaffold, GSP), pea (gel-based pea protein scaffold, GPP), and faba bean (gel-based faba bean protein scaffold, GFP), and mixed protein formulations (S1-S4), and their physicochemical, mechanical, and biological properties were evaluated. All the scaffolds exhibited a pale yellow color and porous surface morphology. Water absorption analysis revealed that GSP exhibited the highest uptake among the single-protein scaffolds. Notably, the partial substitution of pea or faba bean proteins with other plant proteins, such as soy, significantly improved the water absorption capacity compared to that of GPP and GFP. The degradation rate of plant protein-based scaffolds remained below 10% during the early incubation stages, but increased markedly after 12 h. Mixed-protein scaffolds exhibited over 20% degradation at 48 h, whereas single-protein scaffolds showed less degradation. Texture profile analysis demonstrated that mixed-protein scaffolds had significantly higher hardness and chewiness than single-protein scaffolds, likely due to enhanced protein-protein interactions and network formation. However, cell proliferation analysis indicated that single-protein scaffolds supported better cell attachment and proliferation, with scaffolds prepared using faba bean proteins showing the highest proliferation rate. These results suggest that plant-based protein scaffolds can be tailored based on protein composition to optimize both their physicochemical and biological properties, thereby offering promising strategies for the development of edible scaffolds for cultured meat production.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.