ReviewJHLT open2026
Cognitive frailty and mortality among patients on the heart transplant waiting list: A prospective cohort study.
Review in JHLT open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Frailty is an important prognostic factor in patients with heart failure and in transplant candidates, while cognitive impairment remains an under-recognized component that may further worsen clinical outcomes. This prospective study aimed to determine the prevalence of physical and cognitive frailty among heart transplant candidates and their association with mortality. Physical frailty was assessed using the Fried criteria; cognition was evaluated using the MoCA (cognitive screening) and WASI (general intellectual functioning); and depressive symptoms were measured using the BDI. Cognitive frailty was defined as the presence of ≥3 of 6 criteria in a modified Fried phenotype, which incorporated cognitive impairment as an additional domain. A total of 150 patients listed for heart transplantation within the previous 30 days were included at a tertiary center in Brazil. The study population was predominantly male (70%), with Chagas disease etiology (35%), and a mean age of 49.8 ± 10.4 years. Physical frailty was present in 78.7% of patients, cognitive frailty in 88.7% (MoCA) and 86.7% (WASI), and depressive symptoms in 44%, which were significantly associated with physical frailty (p = 0.021). During 1-year follow-up, 41.3% of patients died and 67.3% underwent transplantation. Physical frailty was associated with an increased risk of early mortality after listing (initial SHR = 5.47; p = 0.023), with significant attenuation of this effect over time (TVC SHR = 0.99; p = 0.008). A similar pattern was observed for cognitive frailty, measured by both MoCA (initial SHR = 1.61; p = 0.011; TVC SHR = 1.00; p = 0.011) and WASI (initial SHR = 1.57; p = 0.012; TVC SHR = 1.00; p = 0.007), indicating a reduction in its impact on mortality risk over time. However, after multivariable adjustment, neither physical nor cognitive frailty remained independently associated with overall mortality. Physical and cognitive frailty were highly prevalent among heart transplant candidates and showed a time-dependent association with early mortality risk. After adjustment for disease severity markers, this association lost significance, suggesting that frailty may, at least in part, reflect the underlying clinical status at the time of listing rather than acting as an independent prognostic factor. These findings also raise questions regarding the adequacy of the Fried phenotype as a frailty assessment tool in this specific population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.