Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42898545›Full record

ArticleHealth affairs scholar2026

Increasing fruit and vegetable access for young children and families: the critical impact of WIC policy.

Shannon E Whaley, Rebecca Brough, Catherine E Yepez, Christopher E Anderson, Marianne Bitler

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health affairs scholar, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Shannon E WhaleyDivision of Research and Evaluation, Public Health Foundation Enterprises (PHFE) WIC Program, a Program of Heluna Health, 13181 Crossroads Parkway North, Suite 540, City of Industry, CA 91746, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9644-2206
Rebecca BroughDepartment of Economics, and National Bureau of Economic Research, University of California, Davis, CA 95616, United States.
Catherine E YepezDivision of Research and Evaluation, Public Health Foundation Enterprises (PHFE) WIC Program, a Program of Heluna Health, 13181 Crossroads Parkway North, Suite 540, City of Industry, CA 91746, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3000-7153
Christopher E AndersonDivision of Research and Evaluation, Public Health Foundation Enterprises (PHFE) WIC Program, a Program of Heluna Health, 13181 Crossroads Parkway North, Suite 540, City of Industry, CA 91746, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0912-6884
Marianne BitlerDepartment of Economics, and National Bureau of Economic Research, University of California, Davis, CA 95616, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5425-401X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants and Children (WIC) has ensured access to healthy foods for participating low-income pregnant and postpartum women and children under age 5 for over 50 years. Serving ∼6.8 million individuals monthly, WIC-eligible foods align with dietary science and only include foods rich in nutrients known to be deficient in US diets. Fruits and vegetables (FV) were introduced to the WIC food package in 2009; the $8-$10/month for FV were associated with small increases in consumption. In 2021, WIC FV benefits increased to provide 50% of the recommended daily allowance for FV ($24/month for children). This marked a critical policy shift supporting FV access for young children and was associated with statistically significant increases in FV intake and household food security for WIC families. Despite these positive impacts, federal policymakers are considering reducing these to as little as $10/month. We present a brief history of the WIC food package; describe the impacts of the 2021 increase in FV benefits that align the WIC food package with dietary recommendations; and add new quasiexperimental analyses that suggest the expanded benefit for FV led to increased redemptions of FV and reductions would likely reduce FV access for WIC families.

Indexed as

food intakefood packagesfruitsnutrition policyvegetablesWIC

Identifiers

PMID42898545
PMCPMC13678218

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.