Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42898544›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in artificial intelligence2026

Temporal phase coverage and patient cohort size in deep learning-based cardiac cine computed tomography angiography segmentation.

Andrew Heller, Li-Yueh Hsu, An-Yu Sun, Matthew Jacobs, Lin-Ching Chang, Marcus Y Chen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in artificial intelligence, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Andrew HellerNational Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, United States.
Li-Yueh HsuNational Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, United States.
An-Yu SunNational Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, United States.
Matthew JacobsDepartment of Computer Science, Catholic University of America, Washington, DC, United States.
Lin-Ching ChangDepartment of Computer Science, Catholic University of America, Washington, DC, United States.
Marcus Y ChenNational Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Annotating all phases of cine computed tomography angiography (CTA) is burdensome. We evaluated how temporal phase coverage and patient cohort size affect deep learning-based cardiac segmentation. Methods: Twelve 3D U-Net models were trained using a 110-patient single-phase CTA dataset or a 20-patient, 20-phase cine CTA dataset. Phase-coverage ablations used one, two, or 20 phases; patient-count ablations were performed within both datasets. One cine patient was used for validation and four independent patients were used for testing. Five cardiac structures were evaluated using Dice and the 95th-percentile Hausdorff distance (HD95). Phase-wise and patient-level Dice consistency and structure-specific volumetric variability within and between subjects were assessed. Results: Full cine training produced higher overall Dice (0.89 vs. 0.87) and lower overall HD95 (4.87 vs. 9.78 mm) than the single-phase reference (both Conclusion: In this cross-cohort comparison, full cine training showed higher overall Dice, lower overall HD95, and greater phase-wise consistency than single-phase training. The evaluated two-phase configuration may inform annotation-efficient cine CTA dataset design, but broader validation is needed.

Indexed as

3D U-Netannotation efficiencycardiac computed tomography angiographycardiac segmentationcine computed tomography angiographydeep learningpatient cohort sizetemporal phase coverage

Identifiers

PMID42898544
PMCPMC13677920

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.