Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42898515›Full record

ArticleBeyoglu eye journal2026

Effect of Internal Limiting Membrane Peeling on Macular and Optic Disc Vascular Density Following Epiretinal Membrane Surgery.

Ismail Evgin, Mete Guler, Gokhan Kokusari

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Beyoglu eye journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Ismail EvginDepartment of Ophthalmology, Kahramanmaraş Necip Fazıl City Hospital, Kahramanmaraş, Türkiye.
Mete GulerDepartment of Ophthalmology, Akdeniz Unıversıty, Antalya, Türkiye.
Gokhan KokusariDepartment of Ophthalmology, Gaziantep City Hospital, Gaziantep, Türkiye.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objectives: To investigate the effect of internal limiting membrane peeling on vascular density of macula and optic disc in idiopathic epiretinal membrane surgery. Methods: Thirty-six eyes of 36 patients who underwent combined phacoemulsification with intraocular lens implantation followed by pars plana vitrectomy and epiretinal membrane (ERM) removal were prospectively included in this study. Based on the intraoperative status of the internal limiting membrane (ILM) after ERM removal, the eyes were classified into two groups: The ILM-peeled group (n=22) and the ILM-unpeeled group (n=14). Vascular density of superficial capillary plexus, deep capillary plexus, optic nerve head and radial peripapillary capillary plexus were obtained by optical coherence tomography angiography before and up to 3 months after surgery. Results: After surgery, superficial capillary plexus fovea vascular density and foveal thickness decreased significantly in the internal limiting membrane unpeeled group. (p=0.016; p=0.048 respectively). There was no significant change in superficial capillary plexus paravofea (p=0.257), deep capillary plexus fovea (p=0.569), deep capillary plexus parafovea (p=0.457), optic nerve head (p=0.545) and radial peripapillary capillary plexus (p=0.975) vascular density comparison between groups. Conclusion: Internal limiting membrane peeling has no significant effect on deep capillary plexus and the optic disc vascular density, but can reduce vascular density in the superficial capillary plexus after idiopathic epiretinal membrane peeling surgery.

Indexed as

epiretinal membrane surgeryInternal limiting membranemacula vascular densityoptical coherence tomography angiographyoptic disc vascular density

Identifiers

PMID42898515
PMCPMC13678136

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.