ArticleBeyoglu eye journal2026
Twenty Years of Anophthalmic Surgery in a Tertiary Referral Center: Etiologies, Surgical Trends, and Clinical Findings.
Article in Beyoglu eye journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: To evaluate the etiological causes, demographic characteristics, surgical procedures, implant features, complications, and additional surgical interventions in patients undergoing anophthalmic surgery over a 20-year period. Methods: The records of patients who underwent evisceration, enucleation, sphere exchange, secondary sphere implantation, and anophthalmic socket reconstruction at our institution between 2003 and 2023 were reviewed. Etiologic and demographic data, surgical procedures, orbital implant diameter and material, postoperative complications, additional surgical procedures, and follow-up periods were recorded. Female patients were classified as group 1 and male patients as group 2, and both groups were subjected to comparative analysis. Results: A total of 603 patients were divided into two groups: Group 1 (female, 32.2%) and Group 2 (male, 67.8%). The mean age at the time of surgery was comparable between the two groups (p=0.830). Trauma was the most common etiology, malignancy the least common. Evisceration was the most frequently performed procedure, and enucleation the least. The mean diameter of implanted spheres was significantly smaller in Group 1 (p=0.001). No significant difference in implant materials was observed (p=0.590). Conjunctival suture dehiscence and infection were the most common complications, showing similar profiles in both groups. Conclusion: Trauma was the leading cause in both groups, with evisceration as the most frequently performed procedure. These procedures addressed the underlying ocular pathologies and contributed to orbital volume restoration when indicated.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.