Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42898509›Full record

ArticleBeyoglu eye journal2026

Twenty Years of Anophthalmic Surgery in a Tertiary Referral Center: Etiologies, Surgical Trends, and Clinical Findings.

Ali Safa Balci, Husna Topcu, Merve Emul, Mehmet Goksel Ulas, Ayse Cetin Efe, Fatma Poslu Karademir, Kubra Serefoglu Cabuk

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Beyoglu eye journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Ali Safa BalciDepartment of Ophthalmology, University of Health Sciences, Sancaktepe Sehit Prof. Dr. Ilhan Varank Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Türkiye.
Husna TopcuDepartment of Ophthalmology, Osmangazi Aritmi Hospital, Bursa, Türkiye.
Merve EmulDepartment of Ophthalmology, Ercis Sehit Ridvan Cevik State Hospital, Van, Türkiye.
Mehmet Goksel UlasDepartment of Ophthalmology, University of Health Sciences, Beyoglu Eye Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Türkiye.
Ayse Cetin EfeDepartment of Ophthalmology, University of Health Sciences, Beyoglu Eye Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Türkiye.
Fatma Poslu KarademirDepartment of Ophthalmology, University of Health Sciences, Beyoglu Eye Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Türkiye.
Kubra Serefoglu CabukDepartment of Ophthalmology, Eye and Body Clinic, Istanbul, Türkiye.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objectives: To evaluate the etiological causes, demographic characteristics, surgical procedures, implant features, complications, and additional surgical interventions in patients undergoing anophthalmic surgery over a 20-year period. Methods: The records of patients who underwent evisceration, enucleation, sphere exchange, secondary sphere implantation, and anophthalmic socket reconstruction at our institution between 2003 and 2023 were reviewed. Etiologic and demographic data, surgical procedures, orbital implant diameter and material, postoperative complications, additional surgical procedures, and follow-up periods were recorded. Female patients were classified as group 1 and male patients as group 2, and both groups were subjected to comparative analysis. Results: A total of 603 patients were divided into two groups: Group 1 (female, 32.2%) and Group 2 (male, 67.8%). The mean age at the time of surgery was comparable between the two groups (p=0.830). Trauma was the most common etiology, malignancy the least common. Evisceration was the most frequently performed procedure, and enucleation the least. The mean diameter of implanted spheres was significantly smaller in Group 1 (p=0.001). No significant difference in implant materials was observed (p=0.590). Conjunctival suture dehiscence and infection were the most common complications, showing similar profiles in both groups. Conclusion: Trauma was the leading cause in both groups, with evisceration as the most frequently performed procedure. These procedures addressed the underlying ocular pathologies and contributed to orbital volume restoration when indicated.

Indexed as

anophthalmic socket reconstructionAnophthalmic Surgeriesenucleationeviscerationsphere exchangesphere implantation

Identifiers

PMID42898509
PMCPMC13678164

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.