Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42898504›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in artificial intelligence2026

Optimizing multi-class intrusion detection in IIoT: advanced feature selection using grey wolf optimizer and machine learning classifiers.

Ibrahim Al-Shibly, Llorenç Burgas, Joaquim Massana

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in artificial intelligence, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Ibrahim Al-ShiblyUniversitat de Girona - Control Engineering and Intelligent Systems, Campus Montilivi, EPS IV, Girona, Catalonia, Spain.
Llorenç BurgasUniversitat de Girona - Control Engineering and Intelligent Systems, Campus Montilivi, EPS IV, Girona, Catalonia, Spain.
Joaquim MassanaUniversitat de Girona - Control Engineering and Intelligent Systems, Campus Montilivi, EPS IV, Girona, Catalonia, Spain.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: The rapid expansion of the Industrial Internet of Things (IIoT) has increased the cyberattack surface of industrial infrastructures, creating demand for intrusion detection systems (IDS) that combine predictive performance with deployment efficiency. Methods: This study proposes a Grey Wolf Optimizer (GWO)-guided fixed top-k feature-ranking framework for multi-class IIoT intrusion detection using candidate-dependent redundancy regularization, class-weighted learning, stratified cross-validation, repeated runs, and independent holdout evaluation. The framework was evaluated on the CIC IIoT Dataset 2025 and independently assessed on Edge-IIoTset as a secondary benchmark across six machine learning classifiers and several feature-selection baselines. Results: On CIC IIoT Dataset 2025, Random Forest and Decision Tree achieved holdout Macro-F1 scores of 0.9389 and 0.9330, respectively, using only 10 selected features, representing an 85.92% reduction from the 71-feature model-input space. Repeated training-only comparisons showed significant overall differences among GWO, BA, LightGBM, and Boruta (Friedman Discussion: Overall, the proposed framework provides a practical balance between predictive performance, feature compactness, and computational efficiency for resource-constrained IIoT intrusion detection.

Indexed as

adaptive feature rankingcybersecurityfeature selectiongrey wolf optimizerindustrial internet of thingsintrusion detection systemmachine learningmulti-class classification

Identifiers

PMID42898504
PMCPMC13677896

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.