ReviewCureus2026
Efficacy, Tolerability, and Safety of Fluoxetine for Panic Disorder in Adults: A Review.
Review in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Fluoxetine is a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI) used in the pharmacological treatment of panic disorder. Its efficacy is supported by clinical trials, but the response to treatment and tolerability vary between patients, driving interest in strategies that could improve its clinical use. This review evaluates the effectiveness and side effects of fluoxetine in panic disorder, discusses clinical, pharmacokinetic, and pharmaceutical barriers to treatment, and assesses current and emerging strategies for treatment optimization. We conducted a structured literature review drawing on two complementary streams of evidence. We reviewed the clinical literature for evidence of fluoxetine efficacy, response, remission, maintenance, adverse effects, tolerability, and discontinuation in panic disorder. A second stream was dedicated to fluoxetine-specific research on pharmacokinetics, pharmacogenetics, formulations, and drug delivery. Clinical conclusions were based on randomized controlled trials and systematic reviews, whereas preclinical and physicochemical investigations were separately addressed as potential future approaches. Randomized trials support the efficacy of fluoxetine for panic disorder across panic symptoms, anxiety, phobic symptoms, global improvement, and functioning. Placebo-controlled evidence suggests that fluoxetine may increase the likelihood of achieving panic-free status during treatment. Fluoxetine has generally been well tolerated in controlled studies, although early activation, gastrointestinal effects, insomnia, and treatment intolerance were noted in some patients. Cytochrome P450 2D6 (CYP2D6) contributes to variability in fluoxetine and norfluoxetine concentrations, but there is insufficient evidence to support the routine use of genotype to guide dosing. Cocrystals, nanoparticles, and intranasal delivery systems can alter physicochemical properties or drug distribution but have not been demonstrated to be clinically helpful in panic disorder. Fluoxetine is a pharmacological option with evidence of efficacy in panic disorder. The clinical value of fluoxetine depends on a balance between efficacy and tolerability. Optimization now should focus on individualized initiation and titration of doses, management of adverse effects, adherence, drug interactions, patient preferences, and ongoing monitoring. Pharmacogenetics, therapeutic drug monitoring, and advanced drug delivery systems are still promising areas of investigation for the future rather than established clinical strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.